RESEARCH REPORTS
Guo Simeng, Liu Taijie, Wu Fengqi, Han Yingchun, Wang Guoping, Lei Yaping, Wang Zhanbiao, Li Xiaofei, Du Wenli, Xiong Shiwu, Xin Minghua, Li Yabing, Feng Lu
[Objective] This study aims to investigate the effects of different short-season cotton cultivars and sowing dates on the spatial distribution of cotton yield and fiber quality, and to provide a reference for the selection of suitable sowing date and cultivar for the application of mechanized wheat-cotton intercropping system in the Yellow River basin cotton production region. [Method] A two years' field experiment was conducted using split zone design in 2019-2020, two short-season cotton cultivars (JX 707 and LM 2387) were taken as the main plot, and the four sowing dates were set as the sub-plot, including May 10th (SD1), May 20th (SD2), May 30th (SD3), June 10th (SD4). The cotton biomass, plant architecture, lint yield and yield components were investigated, and the main fiber quality index and comprehensive index of fiber quality Q score were measured. [Result] Late sowing date (SD4 treatment) showed prolonged flowering and boll development period of cotton, while leaf area index, number of fruit branches and number of fruit nodes decreased with the delayed sowing date. The sowing dates significantly affected the lint yield and boll distribution. There were no significant differences among lint yield of SD1, SD2, and SD3 in both experimental years. However, when the sowing dates was postponed to June 10th (SD4), the average lint yield of two cultivars in two years was reduced by 38.7%, 37.2%, 32.7% compared with SD1, SD2, and SD3, respectively. In addition, when the sowing dates was delayed, the proportion of bolls from the first to third fruit branches increased significantly and the proportion of bolls formed above the sixth fruit branch decreased significantly. Comparing the comprehensive index of fiber quality, Q score, the quality of the fibers from middle and upper branches of SD1, SD2, and SD3 were better than that of the late sowing treatment (SD4). There were significant differences between two cultivars in terms of yield and fiber quality. Specifically, the cotton lint yield was higher in LM 2387, and the fiber quality was better in JX 707 in both years. [Conclusion] In summary, for both cotton varieties, the sowing date in May (SD1, SD2, and SD3) showed no significant effect on lint yield, and with relatively better fiber quality. In order to avoid a significant reduction in yield, the cotton sowing date of the intercropping system of wheat and short-season cotton in the Yellow River basin cotton production region should not be later than May 30th.