本研究于2006―2007年度在费萨拉巴德农业大学农业研究试验场进行，试验目的是为了比较三个不同品种陆地棉在不同的行距下的性状质量。试验处理包含三种行间距（60 cm、75 cm和90 cm）和三种不同陆地棉品种（NIAB-111, CIM-496 与 FH-901）。所有的实验数据均进行变异系数的统计学分析。试验结果显示，行距显著影响GOT值，但是对纤维长度、纤维比强度、纤维整齐度和纤维细度没有影响。三种陆地棉品种之间在纤维长度、纤维比强度和纤维细度上存在显著差异，而在纤维整齐度和GOT上没有显著差异。
Abstract
A field trial was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad during cotton season 2006-07 to compare quality traits among three varieties of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) under varying row spacings. The treatments were comprised of three row spacings viz. 60, 75 and 90 cm and three cotton cultivars viz. NIAB-111, CIM-496 and FH-901. Data thus collected were statistically analyzed by conducting analysis of variance. The experimental results revealed that row spacing significantly affected the ginning out turn, while fibre length, fibre strength, fibre uniformity and fibre fineness remained unaffected. The varieties differed significantly in fibre length, fibre strengthand fibre fineness while ginning out turn and fibre uniformity remained unaffected.
关键词
棉花 /
品种 /
行距 /
纤维质量性状 /
GOT
{{custom_keyword}} /
Keywords
cotton /
varieties /
row spacing /
fibre quality /
GOT
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] WITTEN T K, Cothren J T. Varietal comparisons in ultra narrow row cotton (UNRC)
[C］ //Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf, San Antonio, TX. 2000-01-04－08. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am. 2000: 608.
[2] JONES M A. Evaluation of ultra-narrow row cotton in South Carolina
[C］ //Proc Beltwide Cotton Con, Anaheim, CA. 2001- 01-09－13. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am, 2001: 522- 524.
[3] PARVIN D W, Burkhalter J W, Cooke F T, et al. Three years experience with skip-row cotton production in Mississippi, 1999-2001
[C］//Proceedings 2002 Beltwide Cotton Conference. 2002.
[4] ATWELL S D. Influence of ultra narrow row on cotton growth and development
[C］ //Proceedings 1996 Beltwide Cotton Conference. 1996:1187-1189.
[5] BUEHRING N W, Willcutt M H, Nice G R, et al. UNR cotton response to seeding rates[R］//2000 North Mississippi Research and Extension Center Annual Report. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Information Bulletin, 2001: 125-127.
[6] NICHOLS S P, Snipes C E, Jones M A. Evaluation of varieties and plant population in ultra narrow cotton in Mississipp
[C］ // Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conference. 2002.
[7] PARVIN D W, Gentry J, Cooke F T, et al. Three years experience with ultra narrow row cotton production in Mississippi, 1999-2001
[C］ //Proceedings 2002 Beltwide Cotton Conference. 2002.
[8] ANTHONY W S, Molin B. Ginning and fiber characteristics of cotton varieties planted in ultra narrow row and conventional patterns
[C］. // Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. 2000-01-04－08. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am, 2000: 785-792.
[9] HEITHOLT J J, Pettigrew W T, Meredith W R. Growth, boll opening rate, and fiber properties of narrow-row cotton
[J］. Agron J, 1993, 85: 590-594.
[10] GERIK T J, Lemon R G, Faver K L, et al. Performance of ultra-narrow row cotton in central Texas
[C］ //Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conf, San Diego, CA. 1998-01-05－09. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am, 1998: 1406-1408.
[11] VORIES E D, Glover R E, Bryant K J. A three-year study of UNR cotton
[C］ // Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conf, Orlando, FL. 1999-01-03-07. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am, 1999: 1480-1482.
[12] BRADOW J M, Davidonis G H. Quantitation of fiber quality and the cotton production- processing interface: A physiologist’s perspective
[J］. J Cotton Sci, 2000(4):34-64.
[13] Mcalister D D. Comparison of ultra-narrow row and conventionally grown cottons
[J］. Appl Eng Agric, 2001,17: 737-741.
[14] VORIES E D, Valco T D, Bryant K J, et al. Three year comparison of conventional and ultra narrow row cotton production systems
[J］. Appl Eng Agric, 2001,17: 583-589.
[15] JOST P H, Cothren J T. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacings
[J］. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 430-435.
[16] HEITHOLT J J, Pettigrew W T, Meredith W R . Light interception and lint yield on narrow row cotton
[J］. Crop Sci, 1992, 32: 728-733.
[17] BUXTON D R, Patterson L L, Briggs R E. Fruiting pattern in narrow row cotton
[J］. Crop Sci, 1979, 19: 17-22.
[18] JOST P H, Cothren J T. Phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences in ultra-narrow row and conventionally spaced cotton
[J］. Crop Sci, 2001, 41:1150-1159.
[19] STEEL R G D, Torrie J H, Deekey D A. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach[M］. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co Inc, 1997: 400-428.
[20] BRIDGE R R, Meredith W R, Chism J F. Influence of planting method and plant population on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
[J］. Agron J, 1973, 65: 104-109.
[21] NICHOLS S P, Snipes C E, Jones M A. Evaluation of row spacing and mepiquat chloride in cotton
[J］. J Cotton Sci, 2003, 7: 148-155.
[22] JOST P H. Comparisons of ultra-narrow row and conventionally-spaced cotton
[D］. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ, 2000.
[23] VALCO T D, Stanley W S, McAllister D D. Ultra narrow row cotton ginning and textile performance results
[C］ // Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conf, Anaheim, CA. 2001-01-09－13. Memphis, TN: Natl Cotton Council Am, 2001: 355-357.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(271 KB)
