轻简化基质育苗棉苗栽前离床期耐受生理特性研究

doi:10.11963/1002-7807.wgplyb.20170710

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】明确棉花轻简化基质育苗技术下的幼苗离床耐受生理相关特性，为其安全存放和运输保护提供理论支持。【方法】设置了育苗基质添加保水剂和不添加保水剂的处理，以中棉所50为材料，研究了29 d苗龄的幼苗不同离床和复水条件下的相关生理指标变化。【结果】室内条件下棉苗离床的耐受过程中，幼苗叶片逐步失水，引起从叶片外部表层细胞结构到内部生理的一系列变化，最终影响移栽成活率。其中，离床3 d内是安全期，叶片含水量的损失不到5%，且及时复水后能达到幼苗离床前初始状态的98%以上，移栽成活率均在99%以上；此时叶片表层细胞结构相对完整，细胞连接相对平滑，保卫细胞相对饱满。离床5 d为临界期，此时复水仅能达到初期的93%左右；第5至7天叶片失水最快，这个阶段相对含水率日均下降15百分点；当失水降到50%以下（11 d后）时，叶片表层细胞皱缩较严重，细胞壁皱褶明显，气孔塌陷较深，复水后恢复能力弱。失水过程中真叶内脯氨酸、丙二醛含量和过氧化物酶活力随离床时间增加而上升/增加，过氧化氢酶和超氧化物歧化酶活力变化在前5 d上升，5 d后开始下降。【结论】保水剂有利于维持离床棉苗体内水分，缓解离床期干旱胁迫。

关键词: 棉花; 轻简育苗; 幼苗耐受力; 失水胁迫; 移栽; 成活率

Abstract: [Objective] The primary target of this experiment was to illustrate the tolerant physiological characteristics of cotton seedlings nursed with simplified techniques after removal from the seedling bed to show theoretical support for these techniques in terms of safe storage and protection during transportation. [Method] Plants of the cotton variety CCRI 50 were grown in nursing substrate with (W) and without (0) an added water-retaining agent. Physiological indexes of cotton leaves were tested, and the cellular structure of the leaves was observed with the scanning electron microscope. [Result] The results showed that the leaf relative water content (LRWR) decreased to 95% in 3 d under the two treatments but could return to 98% when the seedlings were rewatered and that the survival rate following transplanting was above 99%. Scaning electron microscopy indicated that the cellular structure of the leaves was quite integrated, with a continuous and smooth surface. Additionally, the cell junction was natural and stomata guard cells were relatively well-stacked. Five days after removal from the seedling bed was the demarcation line for the activity of cotton seedlings, with LRWR decreasing by 10 percentage points and only reaching 93% when rewatered. From 5 d to 7 d, when the seedlings were removed from bed, the leaf gradually suffered increasing drought stress and water in the leaf was lost quickly. This lead to a decrease in the LRWR at a rate of up to 15 percentage points per day. By 11 d, the LRWR had dropped to 50%, the cells of the outer leaves had shrunk severely, the cytoderm was folded and overlapped, and the guard cells had collapsed, indicating that water loss dramatically weakened the recovery capability of these plants. The proline and malondialdehyde contents of the seedlings increased during their removal from the beds, and the activity of peroxidase increased. The activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase increased during the first 5 d before decreasing again. [Conclusion] The inclusion of a water-retaining agent in the nursing substrate will help to maintain water level in the plants that can help relieve drought stress associated with the bed-away-seedlings.

Key words: cotton; simplified seedling technique; seedling tolerance; drought stress; transplantation; survival rate

中图分类号:

S562.043

王国平, 韩迎春, 李亚兵, 范正义, 田怀芹, 冯璐, 杨北方, 支晓宇, 毛树春. 轻简化基质育苗棉苗栽前离床期耐受生理特性研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(5): 466-475.

Wang Guoping, Han Yingchun, Li Yabing, Fan Zhengyi, Tian Huaiqin, Feng Lu, Yang Beifang, Zhi Xiaoyu, Mao Shuchun. Study of the Tolerant Physiology of Cotton Seedlings Nursed with Simplified Techniques after Removal from the Seedling Bed[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(5): 466-475.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/1002-7807.wgplyb.20170710

https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y2017/V29/I5/466

参考文献

[1] 中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013: 582-620.
Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cotton cultivation in China[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2013: 582-620.
[2] 刘巽浩, 陈阜, 吴尧. 多熟种植——中国农业的中流砥柱[J]. 作物杂志, 2015(6): 1-9.
Liu Xunhao, Chen Fu, Wu Yao. Multiple cropping: The principal part of China's agriculture[J]. Crops, 2015(6): 1-9.
[3] 毛树春, 韩迎春. 图说棉花基质育苗移栽[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2009: 1-12, 22-35, 94-106.
Mao Shuchun, Han Yingchun. Illustration and description of seedling transplanted cotton[M]. Beijing: Jindun Press, 2009: 1-12, 22-35, 94-106.
[4] 毛树春, 韩迎春, 王国平, 等. 棉花工厂化育苗和机械化移栽技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(11): 2395.
Mao Shuchun, Han Yingchun, Wang Guoping, et al. The technology of cotton seeding raising in greenhouse and root-naked transplanting by machine[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(11): 2395.
[5] 李中华, 王国占, 齐飞. 我国设施农业发展现状及发展思路[J]. 中国农机化, 2012(1): 7-10.
Li Zhonghua, Wang Guozhan, Qi Fei. Current situation and thinking of development of protected agriculture in China[J].Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2012(1): 7-10.
[6] 杨其长, 魏灵玲, 刘文科, 等. 中国设施农业研究现状及发展战略[J]. 中国农业信息, 2012(11): 23-27.
Yang Qichang, Wei Lingling, Liu Wenke, et al. Current situation and developing strategy of protected agriculture in China[J]. China Agriculture Information, 2012(11): 23-27.
[7] 何芬, 马承伟. 中国设施农业发展现状与对策分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(3): 462-465.
He Fen, Ma Chengwei. Development and strategy of facility agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(3): 462-465.
[8] 毛树春, 韩迎春, 王国平, 等. 棉花基质育苗和裸苗移栽存在问题及克服办法[J]. 中国棉花, 2007, 34(3): 32-34.
Mao Shuchun, Han Yingchun, Wang Guoping, et al. The problems and overcoming measures of cotton matrix seedling and rootnaked transplant[J]. China Cotton, 2007, 34(3): 32-34.
[9] 孙景洲, 魏玉桂, 李玉晏. 提高苗木调运成活率要点[J]. 中国林业, 2010(13): 57.
Sun Jingzhou, Wei Yugui, Li Yuyan. The key points for increasing the nursery stock' survival rate[J]. Forestry of China, 2010(13): 57.
[10] 李晶, 于波. 苗木在运输与栽植过程中的保护[J]. 养殖技术顾问, 2013(10): 122.
Li Jing, Yu Bo. The protection of nursery stock in the process of carriage and transplant[J]. Technical Advisor for Animal Husbandry, 2013(10): 122.
[11] 李继东, 毕会涛, 武应霞, 等. 移栽期间胁迫对苗木影响的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(6): 125-136.
Li Jidong, Bi Huitao, Wu Yingxia, et al. Recent advances in effects of different stresses in transplant on the seedling performance[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(6): 125-136.
[12] 柴伟国, 王仲辉, 洪文英. 保水剂在蔬菜基质育苗中的应用研究[J]. 上海蔬菜, 1998(3): 21-23.
Chai Weiguo, Wang Zhonghui, Hong Wenying. The applied research of water-retaining agent in the vegetable's substance nursing[J]. Shanghai Vegetable, 1998(3): 21-23.
[13] 赵瑞, 张玉龙, 须晖, 等. 保水剂对黄瓜穴盘苗基质水分状况及秧苗质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 21(9): 318-320, 375.
Zhao Rui, Zhang Yulong, Xu Hui, et al. The effect of water-retaining agent on water status of plug substance and quality of cucumber seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 21(9): 318-320, 375.
[14] 胡国霞, 马连菊, 陈强, 等. 植物抗氧化系统对水分胁迫及复水响应研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(3): 1278-1280, 1282.
Hu Guoxia, Ma Lianju, Chen Qiang, et al. Research progress on the response of plant antioxidant system to water stress and rewatering[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2011, 39(3): 1278-1280, 1282.
[15] 彭素琴. 植物水分胁迫研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(15): 7748-7749, 7771.
Peng Suqin. Research progress of the water stress in plants[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2010, 38(15): 7748-7749, 7771.
[16] 陈少瑜, 郎南军, 李吉跃, 等. 干旱胁迫下3树种苗木叶片相对含水量、质膜相对透性和脯氨酸含量的变化[J]. 西部林业科学, 2004, 33(3): 30-33.
Chen Shaoyu, Lang Nanjun, Li Jiyue, et al. Changes of relative water content, relative plasma membrane permeability and proline content of seedlings of three species under drought stress [J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2004, 33(3): 30-33.
[17] Sato F, Yoshioka H, Fujwara T, et al. Physiological responses of cabbage plug seedlings to water stress during low-temperature storage in darkness[J]. Sciatica Horticulturae, 2004, 101(4): 349- 357.
[18] Sato F, Yoshioka H, Fujwara T. Effects of storage temperature on carbohydrate content and seedling quality of cabbage plug seedlings[J]. Environment Control in Biology, 1999, 37(4): 249- 255.
[19] 王瑞霞. 贮藏期间不同控制条件对穴盘苗生长和质量的影响极其机理[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2005.
Wang Ruixia. Effects of different control conditions on growth and quality of plug seedling during storage and the mechanism[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2005.
[20] 李柏年, 高金城, 陈茨珀. 植物叶片扫描电镜样品制备[J]. 植物学通报, 1988, 5(2): 119-121.
Li Bainian, Gao Jincheng, Chen Cipo. Sample preparation of plant leaves in the SEM[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1988, 5(2): 119-121.
[21] 穆立蔷, 周浩, 曲伟娣. 黑龙江椴树属植物叶表皮形态学观察[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(2): 183-186.
Mu Liqiang, Zhou Hao, Qu Weidi. Leaf epidermis morphological observation of Tiliacea in Heilongjiang province[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2008, 28(2): 183-186.
[22] 侯燕鸣, 胡剑江, 方蔷, 等. 扫描电镜的不同含水量植物叶片样品的处理及观察方法研究[J]. 分析仪器, 2011(5): 45-48.
Hou Yanming, Hu Jianjiang, Fang Qiang, et al. The research of observation method and processing samples for different water content of plant leaf in the SEM[J]. Analytical Instrument, 2011(5): 45-48.
[23] 朱广廉, 钟海文, 张爱琴. 植物生理学实验[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1990: 245-248.
Zhu Guanglian, Zhong Haiwen, Zhang Aiqin. Plant physiology experiment[M]. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 1990: 245- 248.
[24] 王爱国, 罗广华, 邵从本, 等. 大豆种子超氧化物歧化酶的研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 1983, 9(1): 77-84
Wang Aiguo, Luo Guanghua, Shao Congben, et al. Study on super oxide dismutase in soybean seeds[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1983, 9(1): 77-84.
[25] 袁朝兴,丁静. 水分胁迫对棉花叶片中IAA含量, IAA氧化酶和过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].植物生理学报, 1990, 16(2): 179-184.
Yuan Chaoxing, Ding Jing. Effects of water stress on the content of IAA and activities of IAA oxidase and peroxidase in cotton leaves[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1990, 16(2): 179- 184.
[26] 张四七, 曹志华, 束庆龙, 等. 油茶苗存放方式与环境对造林成活率的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2011, 25(3): 121-124.
Zhang Siqi, Cao Zhihua, Shu Qinglong, et al. Effect of the storage ways and conditions on the dehydration rate and the survival rate of oil-tea grafting[J]. Forest Scientific and Technological Development, 2011, 25(3): 121-124.
[27] 寇纪烈, 张小由, 宋玉民. 运苗箱对造林苗木成活的影响[J]. 林业科技通讯, 1988(10): 8-11.
Kou Jilie, Zhang Xiaoyou, Song Yumin. The effect of carry box of seedlings on survival of nursery stock[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 1988(10): 8-11.
[28] 周雪洁, 王改利, 梁宗锁, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对甘草幼苗生理特性和甘草酸积累的影响[J]. 华北农业学报, 2011, 20(7):64-70.
Zhou Xuejie, Wang Gaili, Liang Zongsuo, et al. Effects of drought stress and rehydration on physiological characteristics and glycyrrhizin accumulation of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. seedling[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2011, 20(7): 64-70.
[29] 杜雄建, 师尚礼, 刘金荣, 等. 干旱胁迫和复水对草地早熟禾3个品种生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(1): 73-77.
Du Xiongjian, Shi Shangli, Liu Jinrong, et al. Effect of drought stress and rewatering on physiological characteristics of three Kentucky bluegrass cultivars[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(1): 73-77.