不同咸水利用方式对棉花叶绿素荧光参数及土壤盐分的影响

doi:10.11963/1002-7807.wgegl.20201229

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】本研究旨在科学合理地利用浅层咸水资源。【方法】依托短期定位试验开展了在第3年和第4年不同咸水利用方式下( CK：造墒和蕾期灌淡水; T1：造墒和蕾期灌咸淡混配矿化度3 g·L^-1的微咸水;T2：淡水造墒蕾期灌矿化度5 g·L^-1咸水;T3：造墒和蕾期灌矿化度5 g·L^-1咸水;T4：淡水造墒蕾期不灌水)棉花长势、叶绿素荧光参数、土壤盐分累积及其运移的变化。【结果】 T1和T2处理的齐苗率、株高、干物质质量、叶面积指数、叶绿素荧光参数、产量及霜前花率与CK无显著差异,土壤盐分含量较CK有所增加,但未对棉花生长产生明显抑制。T3处理的棉花长势指标、叶绿素荧光参数较CK显著降低,0~100 cm土壤盐分含量较CK明显增加。【结论】从土壤质量安全和咸水高效利用的角度考虑,连续4年用3 g·L^-1的咸淡混合水灌溉或用淡水与5 g·L^-1的咸水轮灌不仅能节约淡水,且不影响棉花产量。本研究结果为当地在棉花生产中安全利用咸水提供技术参考。

关键词: 咸水利用; 棉花; 叶绿素荧光参数; 土壤盐分; 产量; 生长发育

Abstract:

[Objective] There is a shortage of fresh water and abundant shallow saline water in Hebei Low Plain. This research aims to make scientifical and reasonable use of saline water resources. [Method] The field experiment with five treatments (CK, freshwater irrigation; T1, blended irrigation by mixing fresh water and saline water into 3 g·L^-1 saline water; T2, rotated irrigation of 5 g·L^-1 saline water with fresh water; T3, direct irrigation with 5 g·L^-1 saline water; T4, irrigation before sowing no irrigation in bud stage) was conducted to study cotton growth, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, communication and transportation of soil salinity based on short-term saline water irrigation experiment at the 3^rd and 4^th year. [Result] The results showed that the T1 and T2 treatments had no significant differences in seedling emergence, plant height, dry matter weight, leaf area index, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, yield, and pre-frost cotton rate compared with CK. While, there was an increasing tendency in soil salt content, the plant growth was not impacted, either. In comparison with CK, growth indicators and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the treatment T3 decreased significantly, but salt content in 0-100 cm depth of soil layers increased evidently. To sum up, the treatments T1 and T2 did not show obvious negative impacts on cotton growth. [Conclusion] From the perspective of soil quality and efficient use of saline water, the blended irrigation pattern (mixing fresh water and saline water into 3 g·L^-1 saline water) and the rotated irrigation pattern (fresh water and 5 g·L^-1 saline water) of saline water utilization can save freshwater, but do not decrease cotton yield. The study provided an important technical reference for use of saline water irrigation of cotton.

Key words: saline water usage; cotton; chlorophyll fluorescence parameters; soil salt; yield; growth and development

王广恩,郭丽,钱玉源,刘祎,张曦. 不同咸水利用方式对棉花叶绿素荧光参数及土壤盐分的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(1): 13-21.

Wang Guang’en,Guo Li,Qian Yuyuan,Liu Yi,Zhang Xi. Effects of different saline water irragation on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in cotton and the soil salt content[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 33(1): 13-21.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/1002-7807.wgegl.20201229

https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y2021/V33/I1/13

图/表 7

表1

图1

表2

表3

图2

图3

表4

参考文献 25

[1]	Gao Y, Yang L, Shen X, et al. Winter wheat with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI): Crop coefficients, water-use estimates, and effects of SDI on grain yield and water use efficiency[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 146:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.010. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.010
[2]	Yuan C F, Feng S Y, Huo Z L, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on soil water-salt distribution and water use efficiency of maize for seed production in arid Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212:424-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.019. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.019
[3]	王电龙, 张光辉. 不同气候条件下华北粮食主产区地下水保障能力时空特征与机制[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(S1):47-50. DOI: 10.3975/cagsb.2017.s1.13. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2017.s1.13
	Wang Dianlong, Zhang Guanghui. Groundwater ensure capacity spatial-temporal characteristics and mechanism in main grain producing areas of north China plain under different climatic conditions[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2017, 38(S1):47-50. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2017.s1.13
[4]	田言亮, 张光辉, 王茜, 等. 黄淮海平原灌溉农业对地下水依赖程度与保障能力[J], 地球学报, 2016, 37(3):257-265. DOI: 10.3975/cagsb.2016.03.01. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2016.03.01
	Tian Yanliang, Zhang Guanghui, Wang Qian, et al. Groundwater safeguard capacity and dependency degree of agricultural irrigation on groundwater in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2016, 37(3):257-265. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2016.03.01
[5]	王全九, 单鱼洋. 微咸水灌溉与土壤水盐调控研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(12):117-126. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.017. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.017
	Wang Quanjiu, ShanYuyang. Review of research development on water and soil regulation with brackish water irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(12):117-126. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.017
[6]	喻树迅. 我国棉花生产现状与发展趋势[J]. 中国工程科学, 2013, 15(4):9-13.
	Yu Shuxun. Present situation and development trend of cotton production in China[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2013, 15(4):9-13.
[7]	Chen Sheng, Zhang Zhanyu, Wang Zhenchang, et al. Effects of uneven vertical distribution of soil salinity under a buried straw layer on the growth, fruit yield, and fruit quality of tomato plants[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 203:131-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.024. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.024
[8]	Hirich A, Jelloul A, Choukr A R, et al. Saline water irrigation of quinoa and chickpea: Seedling rate, stomatal conductance and yield responses[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2015, 200(5):378-389. DOI: 10.1111/jac.12072. doi: 10.1111/jac.12072
[9]	Wang Q M, Huo Z L, Zhang L D, et al. Impact of saline water irrigation on water use efficiency and soil salt accumulation for spring maize in arid regions of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 163:125-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.012. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.012
[10]	冯棣, 张俊鹏, 曹彩云, 等. 适宜棉花成苗的咸水灌溉方式及矿化度指标确定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(22):95-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.22.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.22.012
	Feng Di, Zhang Junpeng, Cao Caiyun, et al. Optimal irrigation method in pre-sowing irrigation with saline water and determination of mineralization degree index for cotton seedling[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(22):95-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.22.012
[11]	张俊鹏, 冯棣, 曹彩云, 等. 咸水灌溉对棉花耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(6):107-112. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.06.014. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.06.014
	Zhang Junpeng, Feng Di, Cao Caiyun, et al. Effects of saline water irrigation on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of cotton[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(6):107-112. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.06.014
[12]	张俊鹏, 曹彩云, 冯棣, 等. 微咸水造墒条件下植棉方式对产量与土壤水盐的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(2):97-102. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.02.019. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.02.019
	Zhang Junpeng, Cao Caiyun, Feng Di, et al. Effects of different planting patterns on cotton yield and soil water-salt under brackish water irrigation before sowing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(2):97-102. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.02.019
[13]	Flowers T J, Ragab R, Malash N, et al. Sustainable strategies for irrigation in salt-prone Mediterranean: SALTMED[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 78(1-2):3-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.014. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.014
[14]	Kang Y H, Chen M, Wan S Q. Effects of drip irrigation with saline water on waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. certain Kulesh) in North China Plain[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(9):1303-1309. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.006. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.006
[15]	Wang Z M, Jin M G, imnek J, et al. Evaluation of mulched drip irrigation for cotton in arid Northwest China[J]. Irrigation Science, 2014, 32(1):15-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00271-013-0409-x doi: 10.1007/s00271-013-0409-x
[16]	李双男, 郭慧娟, 侯振安. 不同盐碱胁迫对棉花离子组稳态及Na⁺相关基因表达影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(6):515-528. DOI: 10.11963/1002-7807.lsnhza.20191106. doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.lsnhza.20191106
	Li Shuangnan, Guo Huijuan, Hou Zhen’an. Ionic homeostasis and expression of Na⁺ related genes of cotton under different saltand alkali stresses[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(6):515-528. doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.lsnhza.20191106
[17]	许艳超, 韦洋洋, 李振庆, 等. 复合盐碱胁迫下半野生棉苗期耐盐性综合评价及其关键生理指标的变化[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3):231-241. DOI: 10.11963/1002-7807.xyczzl.20180430. doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.xyczzl.20180430
	Xu Yanchao, Wei Yangyang, Li Zhenqing, et al. Integrated evaluation and the physiological and biochemical responses of semi-wild cotton under complex salt-alkali stress[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(3):231-241. doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.xyczzl.20180430
[18]	Zhu C L, Huang M Y, Zhai Y M, et al. Response of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize to alternate irrigation with fresh- and brackish water[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 2017, 67(5):474-484. DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2017.1301547. doi: 10.1080/09064710.2017.1301547
[19]	朱成立, 强超, 黄明逸, 等. 咸淡水交替灌溉对滨海垦区夏玉米生理生长的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(12):253-261. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.12.031. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.12.031
	Zhu Chengli, Qiang Chao, Huang Mingyi, et al. Effect of alternate irrigation with fresh and slight saline water on physiological growth of summer maize in coastal reclamation area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(12):253-261. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.12.031
[20]	Wei M, Guo H J, Zhou G W, et al. Root distribution and growth of cotton as affected by drip irrigation with saline water[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 169:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.002. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.002
[21]	郭仁松, 林涛, 徐海江, 等. 微咸水滴灌对绿洲棉田水盐运移特征及棉花产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):211-216. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.035. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.035
	Guo Rensong, Lin Tao, Xu Haijiang, et al. Effect of saline water drip irrigation on water and salt transport features and cotton yield of oasis cotton field[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(1):211-216. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.035
[22]	Chen W L, Jin M G, Ferré T P A, et al. Spatial distribution of soil moisture, soil salinity, and root density beneath a cotton field under mulched drip irrigation with brackish and fresh water[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215:207-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.019. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.019
[23]	周立峰, 杨荣, 冯浩. 微咸水膜下滴灌对盐碱化农田土壤斥水特征的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(7):322-332. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.07.035. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.07.035
	Zhou Lifeng, Yan Gong, Feng Hao. Effect of mulched drip irrigation with brackish saline water on soil water repellency characteristics of saline-alkali field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(7):322-332. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.07.035
[24]	栗现文, 靳孟贵, 袁晶晶, 等. 微咸水膜下滴灌棉田漫灌洗盐评价[J]. 水利学报, 2014, 45(9):1091-1098, 1105.
	Li Xianwen, Jin Menggui, Yuan Jingjing, et al. Evaluation of soil salts leaching in cotton field after mulched drip irrigation with brackish water by freshwater flooding[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 45(9):1091-1098, 1105.
[25]	张珂萌, 牛文全, 汪有科, 等. 微咸水微润灌溉下土壤水盐运移特性研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(1):175-182. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.01.023. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.01.023
	Zhang Kemeng, Niu Wenquan, Wang Youke, et al. Characteristics of water and salt movement in soil under moistube-irrigation with brackish water[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(1):175-182. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.01.023

灌溉水矿化度 Salinity of irrigation water /(g·L^-1)	离子浓度 Ion concentration /(mmol·L^-1 )
灌溉水矿化度 Salinity of irrigation water /(g·L^-1)	Ca²⁺	Mg²⁺	K⁺	Na⁺	SO₄^2-	HCO₃^-	Cl^-
淡水fresh water (CK)	0.73	0.84	0.14	10.86	5.81	1.01	7.67
3 g·L^-1	0.93	1.92	0.19	41.14	13.65	1.19	34.42
5 g·L^-1	1.08	2.57	0.22	72.25	20.16	1.27	58.43

年份 Years	处理 Treatment	单株干物质质量 Dry matter weight /g			株高Plant heigh /cm
年份 Years	处理 Treatment	06-25	07-20	08-20	06-25	07-20	08-20
2015	CK	15.7±1.1 a	78.7±5.9 a	183.8±7.9 a	53.7±2.6 a	88.2±3.9 a	105.1±4.0 a
	T1	16.1±1.2 a	77.6±5.7 a	183.1±7.0 a	53.8±2.5 a	89.4±3.1 a	105.6±4.7 a
	T2	15.3±1.16 a	77.1±2.8 a	178.0±9.5 a	53.8±2.6 a	88.2±3.1 a	106.8±4.4 a
	T3	13.4±0.9 b	67.2±5.9 b	164.2±5.9 b	47.6±1.9 b	75.1±3.6 b	93.4±2.7 b
	T4	12.7±1.0 b	64.0±5.5 b	148.8±6.6 c	46.1±1.6 b	70.1±3.4 b	84.9±4.5 c
2016	CK	18.6±0.9 a	92.7±5.2 a	200.1±10.6 a	56.1±3.1 a	95.8±3.0 a	116.4±3.8 a
	T1	17.7±0.8 a	92.8±7.4 a	196.3±7.5 a	56.5±3.4 a	94.9±2.9 a	117.1±5.1 a
	T2	18.2±0.9 a	89.5±7.9 a	198.8±12.9 a	56.4±2.9 a	98.1±3.9 a	113.1±4.0 a
	T3	14.7±0.9 b	73.4±6.5 b	174.5±7.6 b	48.2±3.1 b	82.8±3.4 b	103.2±4.1 b
	T4	15.5±1.0 b	75.9±5.5 b	176.6±8.4 b	50.1±2.4 b	81.3±4.8 b	104.1±3.8 b

年份 Years	处理 Treatment	日期Date
年份 Years	处理 Treatment	06-25	07-20	08-20
2015	CK	0.58±0.03 a	2.43±0.07 a	3.42±0.21 a
	T1	0.57±0.02 a	2.46±0.08 a	3.35±0.22 a
	T2	0.59±0.02 a	2.45±0.13 a	3.49±0.19 a
	T3	0.47±0.05 b	2.03±0.08 b	2.96±0.17 b
	T4	0.46±0.05 b	1.98±0.08 b	2.56±0.13 c
2016	CK	0.46±0.03 a	2.83±0.23 a	3.77±0.2 a
	T1	0.47±0.04 a	2.76±0.15 a	3.73±0.2 a
	T2	0.48±0.03 a	2.72±0.15 a	3.72±0.19 a
	T3	0.38±0.04 b	2.22±0.10 b	3.07±0.11 b
	T4	0.35±0.04 b	2.18±0.06 b	2.94±0.17 b

年份 Years	处理 Treatments	单株铃数 Bolls No. per plant	铃重 Boll weight /g	棉花产量 Lint yield /（kg·hm^-2）	霜前花率 Ratio of yield before frost /%
2015	CK	20.3±10 a	6.64±0.17 a	3 751.0±163.7 a	85.2±1.8 c
	T1	20.8±1.3 a	6.48±0.16 a	3 670.8±119.3 a	85.9±1.6 c
	T2	21.1±1.8 ab	6.51±0.17 a	3 694.7±189.0 a	86.0±2.3 c
	T3	18.2±1.2 b	6.23±0.19 ab	3 475.6±92.7 b	89.5±1.8 b
	T4	13.6±1.2 c	5.80±0.17 c	2 565.3±87.6 c	98.8±0.5 a
2016	CK	23.3±1.7 a	6.72±0.20 a	3 985.3±147.4 a	82.6±1.8 b
	T1	22.7±1.3 a	6.65±0.19 ab	4 019.0±164.0 a	83.1±1.3 b
	T2	22.6±1.2 a	6.73±0.16 a	3 874.3±91.6 ab	82.8±1.7 b
	T3	19.9±1.4 b	6.36±0.10 b	3 654.3±136.6 bc	85.4±1.2 ab
	T4	19.3±1.0 b	6.57±0.19 ab	3 568.3±98.8 c	88.3±2.2 a