黄河流域棉区纤维品质区域分布特征与生态区划研究

doi:10.11963/1002-7807.tsrzzg.20170320

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的旨在研究黄河流域试验环境与参试品种品质性状互作模式。方法选用2005―2014年国家棉花品种区域试验黄河流域棉区中熟常规组19个试验点,作为试验环境;运用GGE模型绘制双标图,结合纤维品质性状选择对适宜的生态区划分进行探讨,并基于GGE双标图对纺纱均匀性指数与其他指标的相关性进行研究。结果（1）纤维的纺纱均匀性指数与纤维的上半部平均长度、断裂比强度和长度整齐度指数呈极显著正相关,与断裂伸长率、反射率表现为正相关但不显著,与马克隆值显示为负相关但不显著。（2）黄河流域棉区纤维品质性状在19个生态试点的表现可划分为3个特征明显的纤维品质生态区。第Ⅰ生态区包括江苏泗阳、响水,安徽灵璧,河南新乡和商丘,其纤维上半部平均长度、断裂比强度和纺纱均匀性指数都显著高于其余生态区,长度整齐度指数显著高于第Ⅲ生态区,且纤维上半部平均长度、断裂比强度和马克隆值协调较好,都达到了国家棉花品种审定的Ⅱ型标准,为“优质纤维生态区”。第Ⅱ生态区包括陕西大荔,河南西华,山东宁津,河北石家庄和故城,其马克隆值较高,纤维上半部平均长度和断裂比强度表现一般,纺纱均匀性指数表现最差,为“普通纤维生态区”。第Ⅲ生态区包括陕西杨凌,山西运城,河南安阳,河北邯郸、沧州,天津宁河,山东惠民、金乡和临清,其马克隆值最低,其余性状表现中等,为“低马克隆值生态区”。结论本研究明确了黄河流域棉区棉花纤维品质生态区的划分,可为黄河流域广适性棉花品种的选育、生态区划分和理想试验环境选择等提供依据。

关键词: 棉花 (Gossypium hirsutum L.); 纤维品质; GGE双标图; 分布特征; 生态区划

Abstract:

[Object] This paper focused on interaction patterns between trial environments and cotton fiber quality performance. [Method] We analyzed the cotton fiber quality distribution characteristics by using the data sets of national cotton regional trials during 2005―2014. Environmental samples were focused on 19 test locations of medium-maturing and conventional cotton varieties in the Yellow River valley. Cotton fiber quality performance and environment interaction patterns based on the selection fiber quality breeding traits, the correlation between spinning consistency index and fiber traits were explored with GGE biplot method to analyze the potential ecological sub-regions. [Result] (1) The significant correlations were found among fiber spinning consistency index, fiber length, strength and uniformity index, and micronaire was significantly related with elongation negatively, while no significant relationships among other traits were detected. (2) The target cotton planting region in the Yellow River valley could be divided into three subregions in terms of cotton fiber quality in the nineteen ecological trials. The ecological subregion Ⅰ including Siyang and Xiangshui of Jiangsu, Lingbi of Anhui, and Xinxiang and Shangqiu of Henan was characterized by best performances of fiber upper half mean length, breaking strength, uniformity and spinning consistency index, in which fiber index were all significantly superior than those of the other two subregions, while fiber uniformity index was significantly higher than that of the subregion Ⅲ. Generally speaking, fiber upper half mean length, breaking strength and micronaire were developed harmoniously and all reached the class Ⅱ level of national cotton registration standard in the subregionⅠ, which was named as "super quality ecological regions". The subregion Ⅱ covering Dali of Shaanxi, Xihua of Henan, Shijiazhuang and Gucheng of Hebei, and Ningjin of Shandong was characterized by relative higher micronaire, moderate performances of fiber length and strength, relative poor spinning consistency index, so named as "moderate fiber ecological region". The subregion Ⅲ containing Yangling of Shaanxi, Yuncheng of Shanxi, Anyang of Henan, Handan and Cangzhou of Hebei, Ninghe of Tianjin, and Huimin, Jinxiang and Linqing of Shandong was characterized by lower micronaire and moderate performances of other fiber traits, could be called as "low micronaire ecological region". [Conclusion] This study helps to definite ecological region of cotton fiber quality in the Yellow River valley, and can provide foundations for the selection of cotton varieties, ecological division and ideal test environment selection in the Yellow River valley.

Key words: cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.); fiber quality; GGE biplot; distribution characteristics; ecological regionalization

唐淑荣,王延琴,付小琼,韦京艳,杨伟华,魏守军,周治国. 黄河流域棉区纤维品质区域分布特征与生态区划研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(3): 274-282.

Shurong Tang,Yanqin Wang,Xiaoqiong Fu,Jingyan Wei,Weihua Yang,Shoujun Wei,Zhiguo Zhou. Studies on Regional Distribution Characteristics and Ecological Regionalization of Cotton Fiber Quality in the Yellow River Valley[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(3): 274-282.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/1002-7807.tsrzzg.20170320

https://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y2017/V29/I3/274

参考文献

[1]	Foulk J, Meredith W, Mcalister D, et al.Fiber and yarn properties improve with new cotton cultivar[J]. Journal of Cotton Science, 2009, 13(3): 212-220.
[2]	Robert L L, Michael P B, Stuart G G, et al.Fiber quality and textile performance of some Australian cotton genotypes[J]. Crop Science, 2010, 50(4): 1509-1518.
[3]	Smith C W, Braden C A, Hequet E F.Genetic analysis of fiber length uniformity in upland cotton[J]. Crop Science, 2010, 50(2): 567-573.
[4]	姜保功, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 等. 建国以来我国黄淮棉区棉花品种的遗传改良:Ⅱ.纤维品质性状的改良[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(5): 528-535.
[4]	Jiang Baogong, Kong Fanling, Zhang Qunyuan, et al.Genetic improvements of cotton varieties in Huang-Huai region in China since 1950's. Ⅱ. Improvements on fiber properties[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2000, 26(5): 528-535.
[5]	马富裕. 棉铃发育及纤维品质形成的生态效应与模拟研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2004.
[5]	Ma Fuyu.Eco-study and simulation of boll development and fiber quality formation in cotton[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2004.
[6]	余隆新, 唐仕芳, 王少华, 等. 湖北省棉纤维品质生态区划及研究[J]. 棉花学报,1993, 5(2): 15-20.
[6]	Yu Longxin, Tang Shifang, Wang Shaohua, et al.The study on the ecological classification of the fiber quality of upland cotton in Hubei province[J]. Cotton Since, 1993, 5(2): 15-20.
[7]	陈源. 高品质棉品种棉铃发育与纤维品质形成的基本特征及其调节[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2006.
[7]	Chen Yuan.The development characteristics and regulation of boll and fiber quality for high-quality cotton cultivars[D]. Yang- zhou: Yangzhou University, 2006.
[8]	Basford K E, Cooper M.Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia[J]. Australia Journal of Agriculture Research, 1998, 49: 153-174.
[9]	Atlin G N, Mcrae K B, Lu X.Genotype × region interaction for two-row barley yield in Canada[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40(1): 1-6.
[10]	Baenziger P S, Clements R L, Mcintosh M S, et al.Effects of cultivar, environment and their interaction and stability analyses on milling and baking quality of soft red winter wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1985, 22(1): 5-8.
[11]	Fisher R A, Mackenzie W A.Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato varieties[J]. Journal of Agriculture Science (Cambridge), 1923, 23: 311-320.
[12]	Williams E J.The interpretation of interactions in factorial experiments[J]. Biometrika, 1952, 39(1/2): 65-81.
[13]	Pike E W, Silverberg T R. Designing mechanical computers[J]. Machine Design, 1952, 24: 131-137, 159-163.
[14]	Yan Weikai.Mega-environment analysis and test-location evaluation based on unbalanced multiyear data[J]. Crop Science, 2015, 55(1): 113-122.
[15]	Yan Weikai, Hunt L A, Sheng Qinglai, et al.Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40(3): 597-605.
[16]	Bilgin O, Guzmn C, Ba er , et al. Evaluation of grain yield and quality traits of bread wheat genotypes cultivated in northwest Turkey[J]. Crop Science, 2016, 56(1): 73-84.
[17]	严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11): 1805-1819.
[17]	Yan Weikai.Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-location variety test data[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(11): 1805-1819.
[18]	许乃银, 李健. 棉花区试中品种多性状选择的理想试验环境鉴别[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1936-1945.
[18]	Xu Naiyin, Li Jian.Ecological regionalization of cotton fiber quality based on GGE biplot inYangtze River valley[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(11): 1936-1945.
[19]	Yan Weikai, Holland J B.A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation[J]. Euphytica, 2010, 171(3): 355-369.
[20]	Yan Weikai, Cornelius P L, Crossa J, et al.Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data[J]. Crop Science, 2001, 41(3): 656-663.
[21]	Yan W K.GGE biplot vs. AMMI graphs for genotype-by-environment data analysis[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 2011, 65(2): 181-193.
[22]	Yan Weikai, Tinker N A.Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2006, 86: 623-645.
[23]	金石桥, 许乃银. 基于GGE双标图与纤维长度选择的棉花品种生态区探索与划分[J].中国农学通报, 2013, 29(33): 165-171.
[23]	Jin Shiqiao, Xu Naiyin.Cotton megaenvironment investigation based on GGE biplot and fiber length selection[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(33): 165-171.
[24]	许乃银, 张国伟, 李健, 等. 长江流域棉花纤维比强度选择的理想试验环境筛选[J]. 棉花学报, 2013, 25(2): 121-128.
[24]	Xu Naiyin, Zhang Guowei, Li Jian, et al.Identifying ideal test environments for cotton fiber strength selection in the Yangtze River valley[J]. Cotton Science, 2013, 25(2): 121-128.
[25]	Yan Weikai.GGE biplot―a windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(5): 1111-1118.
[26]	Yan Weikai, Kang M S, Ma Baoluo, et al.GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data[J]. Crop Science, 2007, 47(2): 643-655.
[27]	许乃银, 李健. 利用GGE双标图划分长江流域棉花纤维品质生态区[J].作物学报, 2014, 40(5): 891-898.
[27]	Xu Naiyin, Li Jian.Ecological regionalization of cotton fiber quality based on GGE biplot in Yangtze River valley[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(5): 891-898.
[28]	Yan Weikai, Kang M S.GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists[M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003.
[29]	张丽娟, 孟亚利, 薛晓萍, 等. 棉纤维综合品质指数模型构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(6): 1130-1137.
[29]	Zhang Lijuan, Meng Yali, Xue Xiaoping, et al.Establishing model of an integrated fiber-quality index[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(6): 1130-1137.
[30]	Mungomery V E, Shorter R, Byth D E.Genotype × environment interactions and environmental adaptation. 1. Pattern analysis-application to soya bean populations[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1974, 25: 59-72.
[31]	中华人民共和国农业部. 农作物品种审定规范棉花[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
[31]	Ministry of Agriculture, China. China standards of registration for cotton varieties[S]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.