Please wait a minute...

   检索  |  高级检索
棉花学报  2018, Vol. 30 Issue (3): 242-251    DOI: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.ldwzyj.20180503
  研究与进展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
干旱胁迫对棉花冠层光合、光谱和荧光的影响
李冬旺,张永江*,刘连涛,孙红春,刘玉春,白志英,李存东
河北农业大学农学院/河北省作物生长调控实验室,河北 保定 071001
Responses of Canopy Photosynthesis, Spectral Indices and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Cotton under Drought Stress
Li Dongwang, Zhang Yongjiang*, Liu Liantao, Sun Hongchun, Liu Yuchun, Bai Zhiying, Li Cundong
College of Agronomy, Hebei Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation of Hebei Province, Baoding 071001, China
全文: PDF(2126 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】研究干旱胁迫下棉花冠层荧光表现。【方法】以转基因抗虫棉农大601为试材,在田间移动旱棚内,设置4种水分处理(正常、轻度干旱、中度干旱和重度干旱),在群体水平研究了冠层光合速率(CAP)、冠层光谱指数和冠层日光诱导荧光(F761)等指标与植株叶片含水量(LWC)和叶面积指数(LAI)间的关系。【结果】两年试验结果表明:随着干旱胁迫程度的加深,LWC、LAI、CAP、归一化差值植被指数(NDVI)、光化学反射指数(PRI)和F761均呈下降趋势,水分指数(WI)呈上升趋势。经统计分析,重度胁迫下的所有指标与对照差异极显著。NDVI、PRI和WI与LWC、LAI极显著相关,NDVI、PRI和WI与LAI的相关系数(|r|>0.6)均低于它们与LWC的关系(|r|>0.8),F761与LWC、LAI的相关系数高于其它光谱指数。【结论】冠层光合速率、冠层光谱指数和冠层日光诱导荧光均能反映干旱条件下植株含水量和叶面积指数,冠层日光诱导荧光可能比冠层光谱指数更为敏感地反映棉花水分状况。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李冬旺
张永江
刘连涛
孙红春
刘玉春
白志英
李存东
关键词 干旱棉花冠层光谱荧光    
Abstract:[Objective] Study canopy photosynthesis, spectral indices and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in cotton under drought stress. [Method] Using transgenic cotton cultivar Nongda 601 as material, a two-year experiment was conducted with four irrigation regimes (CK, light drought, moderate drought and severe drought) under a field mobile shed to measure the following indices and parameters at canopy level: canopy photosynthetic rate (CAP), spectral indices (normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and water index (WI)) and solar-induced fluorescence at 761 nm (F761), as well as plant leaf water content (LWC) and leaf area index (LAI). [Result] The results indicated that LWC, LAI, CAP, NDVI, PRI and F761showed a downward trend along with the prolonging of the drought stress, while WI showed an increasing trend. Extremely significant differences (P<0.01) were found among drought treatments and CK for all parameters. NDVI, PRI and WI were significantly correlated with LAI and LWC (P<0.01). The absolute values of correlation coefficient for NDVI, PRI, WI, F761with LAI (|r|>0.6) were lower than those with LWC (|r|>0.8). F761 was better correlated with leaf water content and LAI than other spectral indices. [Conclusion] It was concluded that CAP, PRI, NDVI, WI and F761 are good indicators in cotton leaves during drought stress. Solar-induced fluorescence seems more sensitive to leaf water status than other spectral indices at canopy level in cotton.
Key words     drought    cotton    canopy    spectral indices    solar-induced fluorescence
收稿日期: 2017-01-23      出版日期: 2018-06-07
中图分类号:  S562.01   
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(41101338);河北省自然科学基金(C2016204004);河北省棉花产业技术体系;河北农业大学青年学术带头人基金
*通信作者: yongjiangzh@sina.comm   
作者简介: 李东旺(1990-),男,硕士研究生,tslidongwang@qq.com
引用本文:   
李冬旺,张永江,刘连涛, 等. 干旱胁迫对棉花冠层光合、光谱和荧光的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 242-251.
Li Dongwang,Zhang Yongjiang,Liu Liantao, et al. Responses of Canopy Photosynthesis, Spectral Indices and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Cotton under Drought Stress[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(3): 242-251.
链接本文:  
http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/issn.1002-7807.ldwzyj.20180503      或      http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y2018/V30/I3/242
[1] 张光辉, 连英立, 刘春华, 等. 华北平原水资源紧缺情势与因源[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2011, 33(2): 172-176.<br />
Zhang Guanghui, Lian Yingli, Liu Chunhua, et al. Situation and origin of water resources in short supply in north China plain[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2011, 33(2): 172-176.<br />
[2] 许大全. 光合作用效率[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2002: 821-834.<br />
Xu Daquan. Photosynthetic efficiency[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2002: 821-834.<br />
[3] Bai Liping, Sui Fangguo, Ge Tida, et al. Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status, membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize[J]. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(3): 326-<br />
33 2.<br />
[4] Krause G H, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 42:313-349.<br />
[5] Moya I. A new instrument for passive remote sensing 1. Measurements of sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 91(2): 186-197.<br />
[6] 罗宏海,张亚黎,张旺峰,等. 新疆滴灌棉花花铃期干旱复水对叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].作物学报, 2008, 34(1): 171-<br />
17 4.<br />
Luo Honghai, Zhang Yali, Zhang Wangfeng, et al. Effects of rewatering after drought stress on photosynthesis and yield during flowering and boll-setting stage of cotton under-mulch-drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(1): 171-<br />
17 4.<br />
[7] 李景慧,韩焕勇,王方永,等.膜下滴灌毛管配置对棉花冠层特性及产量的影响[J].西南农业学报, 2014, 27(1): 65-70.<br />
LI Jinghui, Han Huanyong, Wang Fangyong, et al. Effect of capillary configuration on canopy characteristics and cotton yield[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(1): 65-70.<br />
[8] 王登伟, 黄春燕, 张伟,等. 高光谱数据与棉花叶绿素含量和叶绿素密度的相关分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2008, 20(5): 368-371.<br />
Wang Dengwei, Huang Chunyan, Zhang Wei, et al. Relationships analysis between cotton chlorophyll content, chlorophyll density and hyperspectral data[J]. Cotton Science, 2008, 20(5): 368-371.<br />
[9] 陈江鲁, 王克如, 李少昆,等. 基于光谱参数的棉花叶面积指数监测和敏感性分析[J]. 棉花学报,2011, 23 (6): 552-558.<br />
Chen Jianglu, Wang Keru, Li Shaokun, et al. Monitoring of the leaf area index of cotton based on spectral parameters and the sensitivity study[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23 (6): 552-558.<br />
[10] 黄春燕, 王登伟, 肖莉娟, 等. 不同水分条件下棉花光谱数据对冠层叶片温度的响应特征[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26 (3): 244-<br />
25 1.<br />
Huang Chunyan, Wang Dengwei, Xiao Lijuan, et al. The responsive characteristics between cotton canopy leaves temperature from infrared thermography and hyperspectral data under different water conditions[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26 (3): 244-<br />
25 1.<br />
[11] Penuelas J, Filella I, Biel C, et al. The reflectance at the 950~970 nm region as an indicator of plant water status[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,1993,14:1887-1905.<br />
[12] Gamon J A, Serrano L, Surfus J S. The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels[J]. Oecologia, 1997,112:492-501.<br />
[13] Penuelas J, Gamon J A, Fredeen A L, et al. Reflectance indices associated with physiological changes in nitrogen-and water-limited sunflower leaves[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 48:135-146.<br />
[14] Penuelas J, Llusia J, Pinol J, et al. Photochemical reflectance index and leaf photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency assessment in Mediterranean trees[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997, 18:2863-2868.<br />
[15] Zarco-Tejada P J, Miller J R, Mohammed G H, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence effects on vegetation apparent reflectance: I. Leaf-level measurements and model simulation [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, 74:582-595.<br />
[16] Panigada C, Rossini M, Meroni M, et al. Fluorescence, PRI and canopy temperature for water stress detection in cereal crops[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2014, 30: 167-178.<br />
[17] Ni Z Y, Liu Z G, Huo H Y, et al. Early water stress detection using leaf-level measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence and temperature data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7: 3232-3249.<br />
[18] 马富裕, 张旺锋, 李锦辉. 棉花群体光合作用测定方法探讨[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1998 (S1): 46-50.<br />
Ma Fuyun, Zhang Wangfeng, Li Jinhui. The discussion of the measuring method of cotton canopy apparent photosynthesis [J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 1998(S1): 46-50.<br />
[19] 王冉, 刘志刚, 冯海宽, 等. 基于近地面高光谱影像的冬小麦日光诱导叶绿素荧光提取与分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(9): 2451-2454.<br />
Wang Ran, Liu Zhigang, Feng Haikuan, et al. Extraction and analysis of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of wheat with ground-based hyperspectral imaging system[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(9): 2451-2454.<br />
[20] 赵中华, 刘德章, 郭美丽, 等. 棉花群体冠层结构及光合特性与产量关系的研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 1994, 14(4): 359-<br />
36 2.<br />
Zhao Zhonghua, Liu Dezhang, Guo Meili, et al. Study on the relationship of canopy structure and photosynthesis characters with cotton yield[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agriculture University, 1994, 14(4): 359-362.<br />
[21] 马富裕,李蒙春,杨建荣,等.花铃期不同时段水分亏缺对棉花群体光合速率及水分利用效率影响的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(12): 1467-1472.<br />
Ma Fuyu, Li Mengchun, Yang Jianrong, et al. A study of effect of water deficit of three period during cotton anthesis on canopy apparent photosynthesis and WUE[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(12): 1467-1472. <br />
[22] 张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 等. 膜下滴灌对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用冠层结构和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(6): 632-637.<br />
Zhang Wangfeng, Wang Zhenlin, Yu Songlie, et al. Effect of under-mulch-drip irrigation on canopy apparent photosynthesis, canopy structure and yield formation in high-yield cotton of Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(6): 632-637.<br />
[23] 冯先伟, 陈曦, 包安明, 等. 水分胁迫条件下棉花生理变化及其高光谱响应分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2004, 27(2): 250-255.<br />
Feng Xianwei, Chen Xi, Bao Anming. Analysis on the cotton physiological change and its hyperspectral response under the water stress conditions[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2004, 27(2): 250-255.<br />
[24] Freedman A, Cavender-Bares J, Kebabian P L, et al. Remote sensing of solar-excited plant fluorescence as a measure of photosynthetic rate[J]. Photosynthetica, 2002, 40(1): 127-132.<br />
[25] 张永江, 赵春江, 刘良云, 等. 被动荧光探测水分胁迫对玉米叶片影响的初步研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(9): 39-43.<br />
Zhang Yongjiang, Zhao Chunjiang, Liu Liangyun, et al. Preliminary study on the effects of water stress on maize leaf physiological status through passive chlorophyll fluorescence detection[J].Transactions of the CSAE, 2006, 22(9): 39-43.
[1] 梅磊, 李玲, 肖钦之, 陈进红, 祝水金. 陆地棉植物络合素合酶基因的鉴定与功能预测[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 215-223.
[2] 徐瑞强, 董合林, 徐文修, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 阿地娜·白山哈力, 董泰丽, 付传翠, 吾仁图雅·皮力加, 唐江华. 喷施浓缩沼液对棉花幼苗生长发育和生理特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 261-271.
[3] 李淑叶, 马慧娟, 张思平, 刘绍东, 沈倩, 陈静, 葛常伟, 庞朝友, 赵新华. 外源24-表油菜素内酯对低温胁迫下棉花幼苗光合生理的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 252-260.
[4] 李映程, 张国丽, 任毓忠, 李海强, 武刚, 李天义, 李国英, 张莉. 基于rDNA-ITS和组蛋白3基因序列分析鉴定新疆棉花叶斑病病原[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 271-281.
[5] 陈丽华, 何鹏飞, 袁德超, 欧晓慧, 吴毅歆, 何月秋. 一种防治棉花黄萎病的生物复合种衣剂的研制[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 282-290,封三.
[6] 栗战帅, 魏恒玲, 庞朝友, 王寒涛, 马启峰, 宿俊吉, 陈全家, 曲延英, 范术丽, 喻树迅. 棉花果枝节间长短性状内源激素的差异以及外施激素对其影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 224-230.
[7] 龙金辉, 朱真峰. 融合马尔可夫随机场与量子粒子群聚类的棉花图像分割算法[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 197-204.
[8] 孔令磊, 石玉真, 李邵琦, 黎波涛, 李俊文, 刘爱英, 龚举武, 商海红, 巩万奎, 葛群, 王艳玲, 宋威武, 袁有禄. 棉花陆海渐渗系双交分离群体产量和纤维品质性状的QTL定位[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 119-127.
[9] 张帆, 李晓林, 张敬泽, 祝水金. 病原物协同致病性对棉花黄萎病严重度的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 188-196.
[10] 李青军, 张 炎, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 冯固. 膜下滴灌棉花对3种水溶性磷肥的利用效率和产量响应[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 172-179.
[11] 邵德意, 罗海华, 陈功, 刘云涛, 高欣, 汤飞宇. 花铃期土壤干旱对棉花叶片抗氧化及光合作用的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 155-163.
[12] 高超, 李明思, 蓝明菊. 土壤水分空间胁迫对棉花根系构型的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 180-187.
[13] 乔清华, 张传云, 袁哲诚, 王芙蓉, 张军. 多年连作土壤中棉花根际细菌群落结构及其动态[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 128-135.
[14] 宋兴虎, Tufail Ahmed Wagan, Biangkham Souliyanonh, Saif Ali, 黄颖, 袁源, 杨国正. 氮肥用量及其后效对棉花产量和生物质累积动态的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 145-154.
[15] 张希鹤, 李岩, 郁凯, 霍钰阳, 王友华, 陈兵林. 黄萎病胁迫影响棉花幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的机理[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 136-144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed