不同棉花品种及施钾量对黄萎病抗性生理机制的影响

doi:10.11963/1002-7807.lycbl.20181220

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究黄萎病菌胁迫下钾素对棉花黄萎病抗性生理机制的影响,对棉花黄萎病综合防治技术的提出具有理论指导意义。【方法】在人工黄萎病病圃中,利用3个对黄萎病有不同抗性的品种冀棉11号（JM-11,感病品种）、中植棉2号（ZZM-2,抗病对照）、农大601（ND-601,抗病品种）,研究5种施钾量（0、75、150、225、300 kg·hm^-2）对棉花黄萎病发生、棉株抗病性相关物质含量及酶活性的影响。【结果】（1）感病品种JM-11抗黄萎病相关物质（木质素、总酚）含量和苯丙氨酸解氨酶、过氧化物酶活性受病情的影响较抗病品种ZZM-2和ND-601大;根和叶木质素、总酚含量多少及棉叶苯丙氨酸解氨酶活性高低影响感病品种JM-11抗黄萎病性,根和叶中总酚是影响抗病品种黄萎病发生程度的关键物质。（2）JM-11根对钾含量的敏感性强于ND-601,弱于ZZM-2,对叶中钾含量的敏感性强于ZZM-2、ND-601。（3）JM-11、ZZM-2、ND-601黄萎病最大缓解效果分别为32.5%、26.4%、16.5%,对应施钾量分别为290.5、253.5、229.5 kg·hm^-2。【结论】抗黄萎病性弱的品种通过适量施钾可增强其对黄萎病抗性,减轻黄萎病的发生。

关键词: 棉花; 品种; 施钾量; 抗黄萎病性; 生理机制

Abstract:

[Objective] It has theoretical guiding significance for the comprehensive control technology of Verticillium wilt of cotton to explore the effect of potassium nutrition on mechanism of cotton Verticillium wilt resistance under the condition of pathogen stress of Verticillium dahliae. [Method] Three cotton cultivars Jimian 11 (JM-11 as susceptible cultivar), Zhongzhimian 2 (ZZM-2 as control cultivar), Nongda 601 (ND-601 as resistant cultivar) were adopted, and each cultivar had 0, 75, 150, 225, 300 kg· hm^-2 potassium levels represented by K0, K75, K150, K225, K300. Two factors split plot experiment was designed under artificial nursery inoculated Verticillium dahlia, to observe disease index of Verticillium wilt, and researched resistance associated substances content and enzyme activity. [Result] (1) The lignin, total phenol contents and POD, PAL activity in leaves or roots of JM-11 were more greatly influenced by Verticillium wilt compared with ZZM-2, ND-601; the crucial disease resistance substances and enzymes were lignin, total phenol and PAL for JM-11, total phenol for ZZM-2 and ND-601. (2) The lignin, total phenol contents and POD, PAL activities of JM-11 were more sensitive to root potassium than ND-601, but weaker than that of ZZM-2. The sensitivity of POD, PAL activities in functional leaves of JM-11 to potassium were more sensitive than ND-601 and ZZM-2. (3) The best effect of potash fertilizer for relieving disease index for JM-11, ZZM-2, ND-601 were 32.5%, 26.4%, 16.5%, and corresponding potassium application amounts were 290.5 kg·hm^-2, 253.5 kg·hm^-2 and 229.5 kg·hm^-2, respectively. [Conclusion] Application of potassium could increase the resistance to Verticillium wilt and reduce the occurrence of cotton Verticillium wilt.

Key words: cotton; cultivar; potassium; Verticillium wilt resistance; physiological mechanism

李岩, 张希鹤, 郁凯, 霍钰阳, 王友华, 陈兵林. 不同棉花品种及施钾量对黄萎病抗性生理机制的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(1): 40-52.

Li Yan, Zhang Xihe, Yu Kai, Huo Yuyang, Wang Youhua, Chen Binglin. Physiological Mechanism of Different Varieties and Potassium Application Amounts on Cotton Resistance to Verticillium Wilt[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(1): 40-52.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/1002-7807.lycbl.20181220

http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y2019/V31/I1/40

图/表 13

表1

表2

表3

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表4

参考文献 45

[1]	张昕, 简桂良, 林玲,等. 土壤中落叶型棉花黄萎病菌的分子检测方法[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(5): 990-995. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.05.013. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.05.013
	Zhang Xin, Jian Guiliang, Lin Ling, et al. Detection of defoliating pathotype of Verticillium dahliae in soil by nested-PCR[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 27(5): 990-995. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.05.013
[2]	Amtmann A, Troufflard S, Armengaud P. The effect of potassium nutrition on pest and disease resistance in plants[J]. Physiol ogia Plantarum, 2008, 133(4): 682-691. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01075.x. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01075.x.
[3]	Smit F, Dubery I A. Cell wall reinforcement in cotton hypocotyls in response to a Verticillium dahliae elicitor[J]. Phytochemistry, 1997, 44(5): 811-815. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00595-X. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00595-X
[4]	Pomar F, Novo M, Bernal M A, et al. Changes in stem lignins (monomer composition and crosslinking) and peroxidase are related with the maintenance of leaf photosynthetic integrity during Verticillium wilt in Capsicum annuum[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 163(1): 111-123. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01092.x. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01092.x.
[5]	Li X, Zhu L, Tu L, et al. Lignin metabolism has a central role in the resistance of cotton to the wilt fungus Verticillium dahliae as revealed by RNA-Seq-dependent transcriptional analysis and histochemistry[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(15): 5607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err245. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err245 pmid: 21862479
[6]	Liu X, Jin J, Ping H. Effect of potassium chloride on lignin metabolism and its relation to resistance of corn to stalk rot[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(12): 2780-2787.
[7]	Abduazimov K A, Smirnova L S. Cotton plant lignins[J]. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 1997, 33(4): 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02282356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02282356
[8]	陈捷胤, 戴小枫. 棉花对黄萎病的抗病机制研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2005, 3(3): 427-435. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2005.03.020. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2005.03.020
	Chen Jieyin, Dai Xiaofeng. Research advance on the resistant mechanism of cotton against Verticillium wilt[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2005, 3(3): 427-435. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2005.03.020
[9]	Beckman C H. Recognition and response between host and parasite as determinants in resistance and disease development[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989: 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73166-211.
[10]	夏正俊, 顾本康, 吴蔼民,等. 棉花品种抗黄萎病性与体内生化成分相关分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 1994, 21(4): 305-310.
	Xia Zhengjun, Gu Benkang, Wu Aimin, et al. Studies on the biochemical components in cotton related to the resistance to Verticillium dahliae[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 1994, 21(4): 305-310.
[11]	Grabber J H, Ralph J, Hatfield R D. Severe inhibition of maize wall degradation by synthetic lignins formed with coniferaldehyde[J]. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 1998, 78(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199809)78:1<81::AID-JSFA86>3.0.CO;2-N.
[12]	Mckeen C D, Thorpe H J. Pathogenic species of Verticillium in horticultural crops and weeds in south western Ontario[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1973, 53(3): 615-622. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps73-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps73-121
[13]	El-Bebany A F, Adam L R, Daayf F. Differential accumulation of phenolic compounds in potato in response to weakly and highly aggressive isolates of Verticillium dahliae[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2013, 35(2): 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2013.773943. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2013.773943
[14]	Bell A A. Phytoalexin production and Verticillium wilt resistance in cotton[J]. Technical Report Archive & Image Library, 1969, 2013(8): 1-8.
[15]	Isaac I. A comparative study of pathogenic isolates of Verticillium[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1949, 32(2):1. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(49)80029-5
[16]	Gayoso C, Pomar F, Novo-Uzal E, et al. The Ve-mediated resistance response of the tomato to Verticillium dahliae involves H₂O₂, peroxidase and lignins and drives PAL gene expression[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2010, 10(1): 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-232
[17]	Dubery I A, Smit F. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) hypocotyls: properties of the enzyme induced by a Verticillium dahliae phytotoxin[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1994, 1207(1): 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167- pmid: 8043606
[18]	Cui Y X, Bell A A, Joost O, et al. Expression of potential defense response genes in cotton[J]. Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology, 2000, 56(1): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1999.0245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1999.0245
[19]	Devaux A L, Sackston W E. Taxonomy of Verticillium species causing wilt of horticultural crops[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1966, 44(6): 803-811. https://doi.org/10.1139/b66-094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/b66-094
[20]	房卫平. 棉花黄萎病抗性机制、遗传及分子标记的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2001.
	Fang Weiping. Studies on the mechanism, inheritance and molecular markers of cotton resistance to Verticillium dahliae[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2001.
[21]	Dayaram S, Kumar M, Chaturvedi O P, et al. Enzymes involved in lignin biosynthesis as resistance to wilt disease (Fusarium solani F. sp. dalbergiae) in Shisham[J]. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 2003, 28(1): 128-130.
[22]	刘晓燕, 何萍, 金继运. 钾在植物抗病性中的作用及机理的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(3): 445-450. https://doi.org10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.03.026. doi: https://doi.org10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.03.026
	Liu Xiaoyan, He Ping, Jin Jiyun. Advances in effect of potassium nutrition on plant disease resistance and its mechanism[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(3): 445-450. doi: https://doi.org10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.03.026
[23]	魏胜林, 秦煊南. 氮钾水平与多酚氧化酶活性对柠檬流胶病抗性的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 18(1): 6-9.
	Wei Shenglin, Qin Xuannan. Effects of nitrogen, potassium and the activity of ployphenol oxidate on the resistance of lemon gummosis[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 1996, 18(1): 6-9.
[24]	秦煊南, 尹克林, 刘万,等. 矿质营养对柠檬流胶病的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 18(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XNND.0.1996-01-000. doi: https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XNND.0
	Qin Xuannan, Yin Kelin, Liu Wan, et al. Influence of mineral nutrition on lemon gummosis[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 1996, 18(1): 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XNND.0
[25]	柴家荣, 尚志强, 戴福斌,等. 氮磷钾营养与白肋烟叶内有关生化物质的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2004(10): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2004.10.010. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2004.10.010
	Chai Jiarong, Shang Zhiqiang, Dai Fubin, et al. Relationship between N, P, K nutrition and relative biochemical substances in burley tobacco[J]. Tobacco Science, 2004(10): 31-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2004.10.010
[26]	赵建军. 利用棉籽壳替代麦粒砂繁菌试验[J]. 石河子科技, 2002(2): 11-12. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0899.2002.02.005. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0899.2002.02.005
	Zhao Jianjun. Experiment of replacing wheat grit with cottonseed shell for of pathogen cultivation[J]. Shihezi Science and Technology, 2002(2): 11-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0899.2002.02.005
[27]	刘政, 孙艳, 余渝,等.土传病害鉴定病圃的建立方法: 中国, 102835288 A[P]. 2012-08-28 [2012-12-26].
	Liu Zheng, Sun Yan, et al. Establishment of a disease nursery for identification of soil borne diseases: CN, 102835288 A[P]. 2012-08-28 [2012-12-26].
[28]	赵丽芬, 李增书, 张寒霜,等. 棉花黄萎病种质资源鉴定及抗性品种选择[J]. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(S2): 254-256. https://doi.org/10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.060. doi: https://doi.org/10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.060
	Zhao Lifen, Li Zengshu, Zhang Hanshuang, et al. Resource identification of cotton germplasm to Verticillium wilt and selection of resistance variety[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2007, 22(S2): 254-256. doi: https://doi.org/10.7668/hbnxb.2007.S2.060
[29]	孙鹏程, 李鑫. 国审棉中植棉2号特征特性及栽培技术要点[C]// 中国棉花学会. 中国棉花学会2008年年会论文汇编编. 安阳: 中国棉花杂志社, 2008: 350-351.
	Sun Pengcheng, Li Xin.Characteristics and cultivation techniques of Zhongzhimian No. 2[C]// China Society of Cotton Sci-Tech. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Meeting of the CSCS. Anyang: China Cotton Magazine House, 2008: 350-351.
[30]	王国宁, 张桂寅, 吴立强,等. 抗病、抗虫、高产棉花新品种农大601[J]. 种子, 2015, 34(9): 106-107. https://doi.org/10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2015.09.106. doi: https://doi.org/10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2015.09.106
	Wang Guoning, Zhang Guiyin, Wu Liqiang, et al. New cotton variety Nongda 601 with disease resistance, insect resistant and high yield[J]. Seed, 2015, 34(9): 106-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2015.09.106
[31]	李玉奎, 郭金城, 李成葆,等. 棉花黄萎病病株产量损失与病情分级标准的商榷[J]. 中国棉花, 1986, 12(5): 44-48.
	Li Yukui, Guo Jincheng, Li Chengbao, et al. Discussion on yield loss and grading standard of Verticillium wilt disease of cotton[J]. China Cotton, 1986, 12(5): 44-48.
[32]	谭德水, 金继运, 黄绍文. 长期施钾与秸秆还田对西北地区不同种植制度下作物产量及土壤钾素的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(5): 886-893. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2008.05.011. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2008.05.011
	Tan Deshui, Jin Jiyun, Huang Shaowen, et al. Effect of long-term K fertilizer application and returning wheat straw to soil on crop yield and soil K under different planting systems in northwestern China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2008, 14(5): 886-893. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2008.05.011
[33]	南京农业大学. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
	Nanjing Agricultural University. Analysis of soil agrochemical analysis[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1990.
[34]	尹建波, 刘艳霞, 苏芳,等. 硫代硫酸钠标准溶液标定方法改进[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2014(6): 187-188. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3198.2014.06.100. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3198.2014.06.100
	Yin Jianbo, Liu Yanxia, Su Fang, et al. Improvement of standard solution calibration method for sodium thiosulfate[J]. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2014(6): 187-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3198.2014.06.100
[35]	冯锡兰, 罗立文, 李汝奕,等. 硫代硫酸钠溶液标定实验的改进[J]. 广州化工, 2013, 41(11): 261-263. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2013.11.099. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2013.11.099
	Feng Xilan, Luo Liwen, Li Ruyi, et al. Improvement of the experiment of sodium thiosulfate solution calibration[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2013, 41(11): 261-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2013.11.099
[36]	宋凤鸣, 郑重. 绿原酸和阿魏酸与棉花对枯萎病抗性的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 1996, 22(3): 236-240.
	Song Fengming, Zheng Zhong. Involvement of chlorogenic acid and ferulic acid in the resistance of cotton seedlings to Fusarium wilt[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Science Edition), 1996, 22(3): 236-240.
[37]	韩卫娟, 梁玉琴, 孙鹏,等. 柿属植物叶片多酚Folin-ciocalteu测定法的优化及部分种(品种)叶片多酚含量测定分析[J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2015, 23(7): 787-792. https://doi.org/10.11719/com.app.chem20150705. doi: https://doi.org/10.11719/com.app.chem20150705
	Han Weijuan, Liang Yuqin, Sun Peng, et al. Optimizing of Folin-ciocalteu method for the determination of total polyphenol content in leaves of Diospyros and the determination of leaf total polyphenol of some species (varieties)[J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2015, 23(7): 787-792. doi: https://doi.org/10.11719/com.app.chem20150705
[38]	王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
	Wang Xuekui, Huang Jianliang. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2015.
[39]	郭海军, 黄国存. 黄萎病对棉花叶片SOD, POD酶活性和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 1995, 28(6): 40-45.
	Guo Haijun, Huang Guocun. Affect of infection of Verticillium wilt on the SOD, POD activities and photosynthetic character in cotton leaves[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1995, 28(6): 40-45.
[40]	纪好勤, 郭小平, 潘家驹. 棉花黄萎病抗性的生理生化指标探讨[J]. 华北农学报, 1995, 10(3): 73-75. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1995.03.015. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1995.03.015
	Ji Haoqin, Guo Xiaoping, Pan Jiaju. Indexes of resistance to Verticillium dahliae in physiology and biochemistry[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 1995, 10(3): 73-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1995.03.015
[41]	田秀明, 杜利锋. 棉花对枯、黄萎病的抗性与过氧化物酶活性的关系[J]. 植物病理学报, 1991, 21(2): 94.
	Tian Xiuming, Du Lifeng. The relations between resistance of cotton to Verticillium and Fusarium wilt and peroxidase activity[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 1991, 21(2): 94.
[42]	章元寿. 植物病理生理学[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1996.
	Zhang Yuanshou. Plant pathophysiology[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1996.
[43]	汪红, 刘辉, 袁红霞,等. 棉花黄萎病不同抗性品种接菌前后体内酶活性及酚类物质含量的变化[J]. 华北农学报, 2001, 16(3): 46-51. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2001.03.010. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2001.03.010
	Wang Hong, Liu Hui, Yuan Hongxia, et al. The change of enzymes activity and phenols content in cotton cultivars with different resistance to V. dahliae after inoculation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2001, 16(3): 46-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2001.03.010
[44]	李伶俐, 房卫平, 马宗斌,等. 氮钾配合施用对短季棉光合特性和产量品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2008, 20(5): 379-384. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2008.05.011 doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2008.05.011
	Li Lingli, Fang Weiping, Ma Zongbin, et al. Effects of N and K on photosynthetic characteristics and yield & fiber quality of short-season cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2008, 20(5): 379-384. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2008.05.011
[45]	吴翠平, 王海燕, 郭宗民,等. 棉花氮磷钾化肥配施的效果及适宜用量试验[J]. 山东农业科学, 2007(1): 79-80. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2007.01.025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2007.01.025
	Wu Cuiping, Wang Haiyan, Guo Zongmin, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and chemical fertilizer application on cotton and its suitable dosage test[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2007(1): 79-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2007.01.025

年份 Years	速效氮含量 Available N content / (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷含量 Available P content / (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾含量 Available K content / (mg·kg^-1)	全钾含量 Total K content/(g·kg^-1)	pH
2016	23.1	17.8	152.5	15.8	7.9
2017	23.8	18.2	135.7	14.9	7.6

年份 Years	品种 Cultivars	拟合方程 Fitting equation	R²	X_Y_max / （kg·hm^-2）	Y_max/ %	Y_mean / %
2016	JM-11	Y=3.326+0.164X-1.855×10^-4X²	0.907^**	300	35.8	26.1
	ZZM-2	Y=-9.637+0.328X-6.567×10^-4X²	0.880^**	250	31.3	24.1
	ND-601	Y=-7.407+0.263X-5.659×10^-4X²	0.891^**	232	23.2	18.0
2017	JM-11	Y=3.925+0.180X-3.205×10^-4X²	0.720^*	281	29.2	24.3
	ZZM-2	Y=9.079+0.096X-1.868×10^-4X²	0.744^*	257	21.4	19.2
	ND-601	Y=-4.006+0.050X-1.100×10^-4X²	0.743^*	227	9.7	8.7

年份 Years	钾处理 Potassium treatments	JM-11		ZZM-2		ND-601
年份 Years	钾处理 Potassium treatments	根 Roots	叶 Leaves	根 Roots	叶 Leaves	根 Roots	叶 Leaves
2016	K75	3.9	7.8	1.0	18.7	8.1	2.0
	K150	3.5	11.6	1.2	20.3	7.4	4.8
	K225	5.2	10.9	1.4	26.9	13.2	7.9
	K300	6.0	13.1	1.2	25.2	10.1	6.6
	平均Mean	4.7	10.9	1.2	22.8	9.7	5.3
2017	K75	4.4	8.0	5.1	13.6	9.7	2.9
	K150	5.3	9.7	5.2	19.5	11.7	1.2
	K225	6.5	10.9	5.7	19.9	11.6	4.3
	K300	6.8	12.4	5.2	18.6	11.4	4.2
	平均Mean	5.8	10.3	5.3	17.9	11.1	3.2

年份 Years	品种 Varieties	钾含量 K contents		木质素含量 Lignin contents		总酚含量 Total phenols contents		叶苯丙氨酸解氨酶活性Leaf PAL activities	叶过氧化物酶活性Leaf POD activities
年份 Years	品种 Varieties	根 Roots	叶 Leaves	根 Roots	叶 Leaves	根 Roots	叶 Leaves	叶苯丙氨酸解氨酶活性Leaf PAL activities	叶过氧化物酶活性Leaf POD activities
2016	JM-11	-0.950^*	-0.921^*	-0.931^*	-0.939^*	-0.893^*	-0.951^*	-0.957^*	-0.869
	ZZM-2	-0.901^*	-0.978^**	-0.874	-0.803	-0.900^*	-0.923^*	-0.824	-0.835
	ND-601	-0.947^*	-0.858	0.828	0.864	-0.968^**	-0.912^*	0.864	-0.607
2017	JM-11	-0.984^**	-0.954^*	-0.999^**	-0.944^**	-0.894^*	-0.973^**	-0.933^*	-0.867
	ZZM-2	-0.895^*	-0.980^**	-0.831	-0.937^*	-0.961^**	-0.963^**	-0.712	-0.887^*
	ND-601	-0.984^**	-0.582	-0.921^*	-0.848	-0.884^*	-0.949^*	-0.622	-0.474