Please wait a minute...

   检索  |  高级检索
棉花学报  208, Vol. 30 Issue (4): 291-299    DOI: 10.11963/1002-7807.fgylyz.20180717
  研究与进展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
冀东滨海盐碱地机采模式下播期对棉花产量和品质形成的影响
冯国艺,王树林,祁虹,张谦,雷晓鹏,王燕,梁青龙,林永增*
河北省农林科学院棉花研究所/农业部黄淮海半干旱区棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 石家庄050051
The Effect of Sowing Date on the Yield and Quality Formation of Different Cultivars of Cotton under Machine-Picked Conditions in the Coastal Saline-alkali Area of Eastern Hebei Province, China
Feng Guoyi, Wang Shulin, Qi Hong, Zhang Qian, Lei Xiaopeng, Wang Yan, Liang Qinglong, Lin Yongzeng*
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Cotton in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture/ Cotton Research Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
全文: PDF(2909 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】研究播期对冀东滨海盐碱棉田机采棉模式下不同类型棉花品种产量和品质形成的影响,明确提高产量和品质一致性的适宜播期和收获方式。【方法】采用大田试验,2017 年前茬均为棉花,以杂交棉冀杂2号和常规棉石抗126为供试品种,设计4月15日(B1)、4月25日(B2)、5月5日(B3)3个播期水平,在9月10日、9月20日、9月30日、10月10日、10月20日、10月30日这6个日期进行收获。【结果】冀杂2号5月5日播种皮棉产量接近1 400 kg·hm-2;石抗126则为4月25日播种产量水平最高。不同播期产量主要在9月形成,均占75%以上。纤维品质9月优于10月;冀杂2号随播期推迟而提高,石抗126表现为第2播期(4月25日)较优。冀杂2号第3播期(5月5日)9月棉纤维马克隆值、上半部平均长度和长度整齐度指数差异较小;石抗126第2播期9月20日之前纤维品质指标优化明显,且马克隆值、上半部平均长度和长度整齐度指数一致性较高。【结论】综合产量和品质指标,冀东滨海盐碱地机采棉模式下杂交棉冀杂2号适宜5月5日左右播种,9月底收获1次;常规棉石抗126则应在4月25日左右播种,9月下旬收获1次。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
冯国艺
王树林
祁虹
张谦
雷晓鹏
王燕
梁青龙
林永增
关键词 棉花滨海盐碱地播期产量纤维品质    
Abstract:[Objective] The effects of sowing date on the yield and quality formation of two different cotton cultivars were studied under machine-picked conditions in the coastal saline-alkali area of Eastern Hebei Province, China to identify the optimal sowing date and harvest method to improve cotton yield and quality consistency. [Method] The experiments were conducted in the state-run Haixing farm in Hebei Province during 2017 with a cotton crop seeded in 2016. The hybrid cotton Jiza 2 and conventional cotton Shikang 126 were used in this experiment. Varieties were tested using three sowing dates: April 15 (B1), April 25 (B2), and May 5 (B3) as the main plot. Six harvest dates were also used as subplots in this experiment: September 10, September 20, September 30, October 10, October 20, and October 30. [Results] The lint yield of Jiza 2 was nearly 1 400 kg·hm-2 when the sowing date was May 5. Conversely, the highest lint yield for Shikang 126 was obtained when the cotton was sown on April 25. The yield associated with different sowing times was mainly formed in September, with this month accounting for more than 75% of yield. The fiber quality was better in September than October. The fiber quality of Jiza 2 was improved with a delay in the sowing date. The best fiber quality for Shikang 126 was obtained with the April 25 sowing date. There was a small difference between the micronaire, fiber length, and length uniformity with different September harvest times. The fiber quality index was optimized and the consistency of the micronaire, upper half mean length, and length uniformity were higher with Shikang 126 before September 20 when sown on April 25. [Conclusion] Comprehensive consideration of yield and quality index indicated that hybrid cotton Jiza 2 performed best when sown on May 5 and harvested for the first time at the end of September. The conventional cotton Shikang 126 should be sown around April 25 and harvested for the first time on the last ten-day of September.
Key wordscotton    coastal    saline-alkali area    sowing date    yield    fiber quality
收稿日期: 2018-04-02      出版日期: 2018-08-16
中图分类号:  S562.04  
基金资助:国家青年自然基金(31701380);河北省青年自然基金(C2015301051);河北省现代农业科技创新工程(F17R2017039085、2018113279);河北省技术体系创新团队建设项目(HBCT2018040101、HBCT2018040103)
*通信作者: zaipei@sohu.com   
作者简介: 冯国艺(1982― ),男,博士,副研
引用本文:   
冯国艺,王树林,祁虹, 等. 冀东滨海盐碱地机采模式下播期对棉花产量和品质形成的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 208, 30(4): 291-299.
Feng Guoyi,Wang Shulin,Qi Hong, et al. The Effect of Sowing Date on the Yield and Quality Formation of Different Cultivars of Cotton under Machine-Picked Conditions in the Coastal Saline-alkali Area of Eastern Hebei Province, China[J]. Cotton Science, 208, 30(4): 291-299.
链接本文:  
http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/10.11963/1002-7807.fgylyz.20180717      或      http://journal.cricaas.com.cn/Jweb_mhxb/CN/Y208/V30/I4/291
[1] 毛树春, 李亚兵, 雷亚平, 等. 用“品质中高端”引领中国棉花产业发展——“十三五”中国棉花产业展望[J].农业展望, 2016, 12(3): 40-44, 54.<br />
Mao Shuchun, Li Yabing, Lei Yaping, et al. Developing China’s cotton Industry by producing high quality cotton-China’s cotton industry outlook during 13th five-year plan period[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2016, 12(3): 40-44, 54.<br />
[2] 董合忠, 杨国正, 李亚兵, 等. 棉花轻简化栽培关键技术及其生理生态学机制[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(5): 631-639.<br />
Dong Hezhong, Yang Guozheng, Li Yabing, et al. Key technologies for light and simplified cultivation of cotton and their eco-physiological mechanisms[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(5): 631-639.<br />
[3] Arshad M, Wajid A, Maqsood M, et al.Response of growth, yield and quality of different cotton cultivars to sowing dates[J].Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 44(2): 208-212.<br />
[4] Bozbek T, Sezener V, Unay A.The effect of sowing date and plant density on cotton yield[J].Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 5(1): 122-125.<br />
[5] Jalotaa S K, Buttarb G S, Sood A, et al.Effects of sowing date, tillage and residue management on productivity of cotton (<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.)-wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) system in northwest India[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008, 99(1): 76-<br />
83 <br />
[6] Shu H M, Zhou Z G, Xu N Y, et al.Sucrose metabolism in cotton (<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.) fibre under low temperature during fibre development[J].European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31(2): 61-68.<br />
[7] Zhao W Q, Wang Y H, Zhou Z G, et al.Effect of nitrogen rates and flowering dates on fiber quality of cotton (<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.)[J]. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, 2012, 465(3): 516-522.<br />
[8] 卢合全, 李振怀, 董合忠, 等. 播种期对2个不同类型棉花品种产量和产量构成的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2012, 24(4): 312-317.<br />
Lu Hequan, Li Zhenhuai, Dong Hezhong, et al.Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two different cotton genotypes[J]. Cotton Science, 2012, 24(4): 312-317.<br />
[9] Dong H Z, Li W J, Li Z H, et al. Evaluation of a production system in China that uses reduced plant densities and retention of vegetation branches[J]. Journal of Cotton Science, 2005, 9(1): 1-9.<br />
[10] Dong H Z, Li W H, Tang W, et al. Increased yield and revenue with a seedling transplanting system for hybrid seed production in Bt cotton[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2005, 191(2): 116-124.<br />
[11] Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W, et al. Yield quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2006, 98(2/3): 106-115.<br />
[12] Boquet D J, Clawson E L. Cotton planting date: yield, seedling survival, and plant growth[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2009, 101(5): 1123-1130.<br />
[13] Bange M P, Caton S J, Milroy S P. Managing yields of high fruit retention in transgenic cotton(<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.) using sowing date[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 59(8): 733-741.<br />
[14] 赵新华, 束红梅, 王友华, 等. 播期对棉铃生物量和氮累积与分配的影响及其与棉铃品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1707-1714.<br />
Zhao Xinhua, Shu Hongmei, Wang Youhua, et al. Effects of sowing date on accumulation and distribution of biomass and nitrogen in cotton bolls[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1707-1714.<br />
[15] 杨长琴, 刘瑞显, 张国伟, 等. 花铃期渍水对棉纤维糖代谢的影响及其与纤维比强度的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1612-1618.<br />
Yang Changqin, Liu Ruixian, Zhang Guowei, et al. Sugar metabolism and its relationship with fiber strength affected by waterlogging during flowering and bolling stage in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(9): 1612-1618.<br />
[16] 史加亮, 李凤瑞, 贾立洪, 等. 晚春播对不同品种春棉产量及品质的影响[J]. 棉花科学, 2016, 38(3): 22-28.<br />
Shi Jialiang, Li Fengrui, Jia Lihong, et al. Efects of the late spring sowing on yield and quality of different spring cotton varieties[J].Cotton Science, 2016, 38(3): 22-28.<br />
[17] 张国伟, 张祥, 陈德华, 等. 播期对内蒙古西部荒漠区棉花产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 863-870.<br />
Zhang Guowei, Zhang Xiang, Chen Dehua, et al. Effect of sowing dates on cotton yield, fiber quality, and uptake and utilization of nutrients in Inner Mongolia west desert area, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(3): 863-870.<br />
[18] Pettigrew W T. Improved yield potential with an early planting cotton production system[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(5): 997-<br />
10 03.<br />
[19] Killi F, Bolek Y. Timing of planting is crucial for cotton yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 2006, 56(2): 155-160.<br />
[20] Bauer P J, May O L, Camberato J J.Planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties[J].Journal of Production Agriculture, 1998, 11(4): 415-420.<br />
[21] Reddy K R, Davidonis G H, Johnson A S, et al. Temperature regime and carbon dioxide enrichment alter cotton boll development and fiber properties[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(5): 851-858.<br />
[22] 蒋光华, 周治国, 陈兵林, 等. 棉株生理年龄对纤维加厚发育及纤维比强度形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(2): 265-273.<br />
Jiang Guanghua, Zhou Zhiguo, Chen Binglin, et al. Effect of cotton physiological age on the fiber thickening development and fiber strength formation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(2): 265-273.<br />
[23] 王欣悦, 刘爱玉, 邹茜, 等. 密度与播种期对直播棉生长发育和产量品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2014, 28(6): 597-601.<br />
Wang Xinyue, Liu Aiyu, Zou Xi, et al. Effects of different planting density and seeding date on growing development, yield and fiber quality of direct seeding cotton[J]. Crop Research, 2014, 28(6): 597-601.<br />
[24] 阳会兵, 马一学, 陈金湘, 等. 棉花短季直播栽培模式对产量构成及纤维品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(2): 160-169.<br />
Yang Huibing, Ma Yixue, Chen Jinxiang, et al. Effect of the short-season and direct-seeding cultivation mode on the yield and fiber quality of cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(2): 160-169.<br />
[25] 张新新, 陈吉, 刘敬然, 等. 温光互作对棉花不同空间部位纤维品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5): 861-871.<br />
Zhang Xinxin, Chen Ji, Liu Jingran, et al. Effects of temperature-light factor on cotton fiber qualities at different spatial fruiting branch positions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5): 861-871.
[1] 李冬旺, 张永江, 刘连涛, 孙红春, 刘玉春, 白志英, 李存东. 干旱胁迫对棉花冠层光合、光谱和荧光的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 242-251.
[2] 栗战帅, 魏恒玲, 庞朝友, 王寒涛, 马启峰, 宿俊吉, 陈全家, 曲延英, 范术丽, 喻树迅. 棉花果枝节间长短性状内源激素的差异以及外施激素对其影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 224-230.
[3] 梅磊, 李玲, 肖钦之, 陈进红, 祝水金. 陆地棉植物络合素合酶基因的鉴定与功能预测[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 215-223.
[4] 徐瑞强, 董合林, 徐文修, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 阿地娜·白山哈力, 董泰丽, 付传翠, 吾仁图雅·皮力加, 唐江华. 喷施浓缩沼液对棉花幼苗生长发育和生理特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 261-271.
[5] 李淑叶, 马慧娟, 张思平, 刘绍东, 沈倩, 陈静, 葛常伟, 庞朝友, 赵新华. 外源24-表油菜素内酯对低温胁迫下棉花幼苗光合生理的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 252-260.
[6] 李映程, 张国丽, 任毓忠, 李海强, 武刚, 李天义, 李国英, 张莉. 基于rDNA-ITS和组蛋白3基因序列分析鉴定新疆棉花叶斑病病原[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 271-281.
[7] 陈丽华, 何鹏飞, 袁德超, 欧晓慧, 吴毅歆, 何月秋. 一种防治棉花黄萎病的生物复合种衣剂的研制[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 282-290,封三.
[8] 龙金辉, 朱真峰. 融合马尔可夫随机场与量子粒子群聚类的棉花图像分割算法[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 197-204.
[9] 李青军, 张 炎, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 冯固. 膜下滴灌棉花对3种水溶性磷肥的利用效率和产量响应[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 172-179.
[10] 高超, 李明思, 蓝明菊. 土壤水分空间胁迫对棉花根系构型的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 180-187.
[11] 乔清华, 张传云, 袁哲诚, 王芙蓉, 张军. 多年连作土壤中棉花根际细菌群落结构及其动态[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 128-135.
[12] 宋兴虎, Tufail Ahmed Wagan, Biangkham Souliyanonh, Saif Ali, 黄颖, 袁源, 杨国正. 氮肥用量及其后效对棉花产量和生物质累积动态的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 145-154.
[13] 张希鹤, 李岩, 郁凯, 霍钰阳, 王友华, 陈兵林. 黄萎病胁迫影响棉花幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的机理[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 136-144.
[14] 李春艳 , 石洪亮, 文如意, 严青青 , 张巨松. 海岛棉和陆地棉花铃期光合特性及氮素累积特性的差异[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 164-171.
[15] 孔令磊, 石玉真, 李邵琦, 黎波涛, 李俊文, 刘爱英, 龚举武, 商海红, 巩万奎, 葛群, 王艳玲, 宋威武, 袁有禄. 棉花陆海渐渗系双交分离群体产量和纤维品质性状的QTL定位[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(2): 119-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed