×
模态框(Modal)标题
在这里添加一些文本
Close
Close
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
×
模态框(Modal)标题
×
Toggle navigation
Home
About
About Journal
Editor-in-Chief
Editorial Board
Awards and Honors
Indexed In
Impact Factor
Instruction
Instruction for Authors
Fees
Online Submission
Journal Online
Just Accepted
Current Issue
Archive
Most Read
Most Download
Most Cited
E-mail Alert
RSS
Specification
Paper Structure/Writing
Word Standardization
Unit of Measurement
Punctuation
Typographic Format/Template
Reference Format
Subscription
Advertising Service
Advertising Notice
Advertising Fee
Contact Us
中文
China Cotton
Figure/Table detail
Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of
Lygus pratensis
to plant volatiles and regulation of
Brassica campestris
trapping belt on
L. pratensis
in cotton fields
Xia Xin, Zheng Yixiang, Yao Chengceng, Gou Changqing, Feng Hongzu
Cotton Science
, 2023, 35(
2
): 128-137. DOI:
10.11963/cs20220042
Fig. 2
Selection responses of
Lygus pratensis
adults to the host plants within 4 hours
Other figure/table from this article
Table 1
Purity and source of standard chemical pounds
Fig. 1
Field layout diagram
Table 2
The name and content list of volatile of host plants
Fig. 3
EAG responses of
Lygus pratensis
to host plant volatiles
1. methyl salicylate, 2. linalool, 3. trans-2-hexen-1-ol, 4. ocimene, 5. isothiocyanic acid sec-butyl ester, 6. phenylacetaldehyde. Data are means ± standard deviations; different letters indicate significant difference in EAG response of females or males to each volatile (
P
< 0.05), but same letters indicate no significant difference (
P
≥ 0.05).
Fig. 4
Behavioral responses of female (A) and male (B)
Lygus pratensis
to volatiles from six host plants
* means significant difference between treatment and control (
P
< 0.05); ** means extremely significant difference between treatment and control (
P
< 0.01); ns means no significant difference (
P
≥ 0.05).
Fig. 5
Total amount of
Lygus pratensis
in the rape trapping belts
Mean values with the same letters indicate no significant difference (
P
≥ 0.05) between insect numbers per 100 plants of different rape trapping belts, but different letters indicate significant difference (
P
< 0.05).
Fig. 6
Occurring number of
Lygus pratensis
in cotton fields
CK: control cotton field. Mean values with the same letters indicate no significant difference (
P
≥ 0.05) between insect numbers per 100 plants of investigation points at different distance to rape trapping belt, but different letters indicate significant difference (
P
< 0.05).
Fig. 7
Dynamics of
Lygus pratensis
population in cotton field