Toggle navigation
Home
About
About Journal
Editor-in-Chief
Editorial Board
Awards and Honors
Indexed In
Impact Factor
Instruction
Instruction for Authors
Fees
Online Submission
Journal Online
Just Accepted
Current Issue
Archive
Most Read
Most Download
Most Cited
E-mail Alert
RSS
Specification
Paper Structure/Writing
Word Standardization
Unit of Measurement
Punctuation
Typographic Format/Template
Reference Format
Subscription
Advertising Service
Advertising Notice
Advertising Fee
Contact Us
中文
China Cotton
More options
Journal
DOI
ALL
Cotton Science
China Cotton
Publication year from
To
All
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
All
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Volume
Issue
Author
Affiliation
Search result
Journal
Loading ...
Publication year
Loading ...
Table 3 Effects of spraying defoliation and ripening agent on boll-opening rate and defoliation rate
Table 5 Percentage of dry matter mass of cotton bolls at different plant parts to total dry matter mass per plant
Fig. 1
Weather condition at the experimental field
Fig. 1
Overview map of the experimental area
Table 4 The training results of different models
Table 1 Purity and source of standard chemical pounds
Fig. 2
Selection responses of
Lygus pratensis
adults to the host plants within 4 hours
Table 2 The name and content list of volatile of host plants
Fig. 6
Occurring number of
Lygus pratensis
in cotton fields
CK: control cotton field. Mean values with the same letters indicate no significant difference (
P
≥ 0.05) between insect numbers per 100 plants of investigation points at different distance to rape trapping belt, but different letters indicate significant difference (
P
< 0.05).
Fig. 7
Dynamics of
Lygus pratensis
population in cotton field
Fig. 2
Wheat-cotton double cropping system at the test site
A: Wheat seedling stage; B: Wheat-cotton overlapped growth period; C: Schematic diagram of the wheat-cotton intercropping system (2-1 type).
Table 4 Numbers of DEG between different sample group
Fig. 4
Venn analysis of DEG in buds of CCRI 24 and Zhongyihong at different developmental stages
Table 1 Information on the seed collection of
Solanum nigrum
populations
Fig. 1
Comparison of the SOD activity in
Solanum nigrum
seeds treated by different temperatures
The same lowercase letter indicates no significant difference at the 0.05 probability level (
P
>0.05) among different populations at the same temperature. Conversely, the difference is significant.
Table 1 Particle size of nanopesticide and conventional pesticide
Fig. 5
The expression profiles of
Gh_A07G083500
and
Gh_A07G079800
Statistical analyses have been the Student’s test. ** and **** indicate significance at the 0.01 and 0.000 1 probability level, respectively.
Fig. 6
GO enrichment analysis of DEG
A: GO enrichment analysis of up-regulated DEG, B: GO enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEG.
Table 5 Metabolic pathways of up-regulated PEG
Table 1 Primer sequences used in this study
page
Page 1 of 34
Total 672 records
First page
Prev page
Next page
Last page