
Effects of the spraying time of defoliation and ripening agent on cotton boll development and fiber quality at different fruiting branches
Zhu Jijie, Zhao Hongxia, Wang Shijie, Jia Xiaoyun, Li Miao, Wang Guoyin
Effects of the spraying time of defoliation and ripening agent on cotton boll development and fiber quality at different fruiting branches
[Objective] This research aims to study the effect of spraying defoliation and ripening agent at different times on dry matter mass, yield traits, and fiber quality of cotton bolls at different fruiting branches, and to determine the optimal time for spraying defoliation and ripening agent in Hebei province. [Method] Jifeng 1458, a cotton variety suitable for machine picking, was used as the material. The 50% (mass fraction) thidiazuron-ethephon suspension agent was sprayed at four different times from late September to early October in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Spraying the same amount of water on September 20th was used as the control. The changes of cotton defoliation rate and boll opening rate, dry matter mass, boll weight, seed index, and lint percentage of cotton bolls at different fruiting branches, seed cotton yield, lint yield and fiber quality were analyzed. [Result] The boll opening rate of each treatment was 40%-65% on the day of spraying defoliation and ripening agent, and 20 days later, both of the boll opening rate and defoliation rate exceeded 90%. Compared with the control, when spraying on September 20th, the weight, seed index, lint percentage of bolls on the upper breaches, and the fiber upper half mean length, breaking tenacity and micronaire of these bolls decreased significantly. When spraying on September 20th or about September 25th, dry matter mass of cotton bolls at the upper or middle fruiting branches and dry matter mass of the total cotton bolls per plant all decreased significantly. When spraying from September 20th to around October 5th, seed index of the upper cotton bolls decreased significantly, while seed cotton yield and lint yield increased significantly. Both seed cotton yield and lint yield were the highest when spraying on around September 30th, and the fiber quality was also fine. [Conclusion] It is preliminarily believed that the optimal time of spraying defoliation and ripening agent in the direct seeding cotton field without covering film in Hebei cotton planting region was around September 30th, and the natural boll opening rate reached about 56%.
defoliation and ripening agent / cotton boll / cotton boll position / yield / fiber quality / dry matter mass {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
王爱玉, 高明伟, 王志伟, 等. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术应用研究进展[J/OL]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(4): 20-23[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0680.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
刘盼, 张巨松, 赵元元, 等. 不同脱叶剂对棉花生长和机采质量的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2016, 39(10): 3-5.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶催熟剂在新疆棉花生产中的应用现状[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(2): 26-32.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
朱继杰, 王士杰, 赵红霞, 等. 适宜河北省机械采摘的棉花品种筛选研究[J/OL]. 河北农业科学, 2018, 22(4): 60-62, 103[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx.2018.04.017.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
朱继杰, 赵红霞, 王士杰, 等. 不同棉花品种对脱叶剂敏感性研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(4): 15-18[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.20180416.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
宋兴虎, 徐东永, 孙璐, 等. 在不同棉区噻苯隆和乙烯利用量及配比对脱叶催熟效果影响[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(3): 247-257[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.sxhlzh.20200512.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
张大伟, 魏鑫, 徐海江, 等. 不同棉花品种对脱叶剂的响应[J/OL]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1): 146-153[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.01.018.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
王天友. 南疆陆地棉种质资源遗传多样性及对脱叶剂的敏感性分析[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2020.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶剂对两种机采模式下棉花脱叶效果及纤维品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11): 144-152[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0628.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
周婷婷, 肖庆刚, 杜睿, 等. 我国棉花脱叶催熟技术研究进展[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(2): 170-184[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.ztthxq.20200303.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
马立刚, 王树林, 王燕, 等. 脱叶催熟剂用量对不同棉花品种脱叶效果及产量构成与品质的影响[J/OL]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(5): 16-22[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201901013.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
张文, 冯杨, 刘铨义, 等. 脱叶剂不同施用方法对棉花脱叶吐絮及产量和品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(5): 26-28[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zwlt.20180515.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
刘婵, 马银虎, 李田甜, 等. 不同脱叶剂对棉花产量品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(11): 11-15[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.lchsl.20201112.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
高丽丽, 李淦, 徐新霞, 等. 4种棉花脱叶剂脱叶效果的比较研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016, 39(1): 35-39.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
马辉, 戴路, 李静, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂综合性状效果试验研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(4): 15-17[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2013.04.006.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
闫向辉, 刘向新. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术[J/OL]. 新疆农机化, 2004(4): 48, 61[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7782.2004.04.035.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
廖宝鹏, 王崧嫚, 杜明伟, 等. 棉花不同部位主茎叶对脱叶剂噻苯隆的响应及机理[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(5): 418-424[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.lbpdmw.20200817.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
王希, 杜明伟, 田晓莉, 等. 黄河流域棉区棉花脱叶催熟剂的筛选研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2015, 42(5): 15-21[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1000-632X(2015)0015-07.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
朱继杰, 王士杰, 赵红霞, 等. 适宜机采和露地直播棉花品种冀丰1458选育及配套栽培技术[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2022, 49(5): 25-30[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/cc20210241.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
王谊, 杨丽红. 脱叶剂对棉花脱叶率和产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(4): 28-30.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
高丽丽, 李淦, 康正华, 等. 脱叶剂对棉花叶片叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(4): 345-352[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201604005.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
高丽丽. 脱叶剂喷施时间对棉花生理调节效应的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
田景山, 张煦怡, 张丽娜, 等. 新疆机采棉花实现叶片快速脱落需要的温度条件[J/OL]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 613-620[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84068.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[31] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[32] |
靳丁沙. 噻苯隆调控棉花叶片脱落的机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[33] |
张煦怡. 新疆棉区脱叶催熟剂对棉铃发育及纤维品质形成的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[34] |
田景山, 张煦怡, 王文敏, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂对纤维品质的影响及应用时间的确定[J/OL]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1388-1397[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94196.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[35] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[36] |
张煦怡, 田景山, 随龙龙, 等. 新疆棉区脱叶催熟剂喷施时间对棉铃发育的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(6): 15-20, 35[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zxyzwf.20180614.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |