Effects of the spraying time of defoliation and ripening agent on cotton boll development and fiber quality at different fruiting branches

Zhu Jijie, Zhao Hongxia, Wang Shijie, Jia Xiaoyun, Li Miao, Wang Guoyin

PDF(1133 KB)
PDF(1133 KB)
Cotton Science ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 117-127. DOI: 10.11963/cs20230001
RESEARCH REPORTS

Effects of the spraying time of defoliation and ripening agent on cotton boll development and fiber quality at different fruiting branches

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] This research aims to study the effect of spraying defoliation and ripening agent at different times on dry matter mass, yield traits, and fiber quality of cotton bolls at different fruiting branches, and to determine the optimal time for spraying defoliation and ripening agent in Hebei province. [Method] Jifeng 1458, a cotton variety suitable for machine picking, was used as the material. The 50% (mass fraction) thidiazuron-ethephon suspension agent was sprayed at four different times from late September to early October in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Spraying the same amount of water on September 20th was used as the control. The changes of cotton defoliation rate and boll opening rate, dry matter mass, boll weight, seed index, and lint percentage of cotton bolls at different fruiting branches, seed cotton yield, lint yield and fiber quality were analyzed. [Result] The boll opening rate of each treatment was 40%-65% on the day of spraying defoliation and ripening agent, and 20 days later, both of the boll opening rate and defoliation rate exceeded 90%. Compared with the control, when spraying on September 20th, the weight, seed index, lint percentage of bolls on the upper breaches, and the fiber upper half mean length, breaking tenacity and micronaire of these bolls decreased significantly. When spraying on September 20th or about September 25th, dry matter mass of cotton bolls at the upper or middle fruiting branches and dry matter mass of the total cotton bolls per plant all decreased significantly. When spraying from September 20th to around October 5th, seed index of the upper cotton bolls decreased significantly, while seed cotton yield and lint yield increased significantly. Both seed cotton yield and lint yield were the highest when spraying on around September 30th, and the fiber quality was also fine. [Conclusion] It is preliminarily believed that the optimal time of spraying defoliation and ripening agent in the direct seeding cotton field without covering film in Hebei cotton planting region was around September 30th, and the natural boll opening rate reached about 56%.

Keywords

defoliation and ripening agent / cotton boll / cotton boll position / yield / fiber quality / dry matter mass

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhu Jijie , Zhao Hongxia , Wang Shijie , Jia Xiaoyun , Li Miao , Wang Guoyin. Effects of the spraying time of defoliation and ripening agent on cotton boll development and fiber quality at different fruiting branches[J]. Cotton Science, 2023, 35(2): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.11963/cs20230001

References

[1]
王爱玉, 高明伟, 王志伟, 等. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术应用研究进展[J/OL]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(4): 20-23[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0680.
Wang Aiyu, Gao Mingwei, Wang Zhiwei, et al. Research progress on the technology of chemical defoliation and ripening in cotton[J/OL]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(4): 20-23[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0680.
[2]
刘盼, 张巨松, 赵元元, 等. 不同脱叶剂对棉花生长和机采质量的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2016, 39(10): 3-5.
Liu Pan, Zhang Jusong, Zhao Yuanyuan, et al. The effects of different defoliants on cotton growth and quality of mechanical harvesting[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2016, 39(10): 3-5.
[3]
周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶催熟剂在新疆棉花生产中的应用现状[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(2): 26-32.
Zhou Xianlin, Tan Qin, Wang Long, et al. Application status of defoliation and ripening agents on cotton production in Xinjiang[J]. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(2): 26-32.
[4]
朱继杰, 王士杰, 赵红霞, 等. 适宜河北省机械采摘的棉花品种筛选研究[J/OL]. 河北农业科学, 2018, 22(4): 60-62, 103[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx.2018.04.017.
Zhu Jijie, Wang Shijie, Zhao Hongxia, et al. Study on screening cotton varieties suitable for mechanical harvest in Hebei province[J/OL]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 22(4): 60-62, 103[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx.2018.04.017.
[5]
朱继杰, 赵红霞, 王士杰, 等. 不同棉花品种对脱叶剂敏感性研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(4): 15-18[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.20180416.
Zhu Jijie, Zhao Hongxia, Wang Shijie, et al. Study on the sensitivity of different cotton cultivars to defoliant[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(4): 15-18[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.20180416.
[6]
宋兴虎, 徐东永, 孙璐, 等. 在不同棉区噻苯隆和乙烯利用量及配比对脱叶催熟效果影响[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(3): 247-257[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.sxhlzh.20200512.
Song Xinghu, Xu Dongyong, Sun Lu, et al. Effect of thidiazuron and ethylene use and ratio on defoliation ripening in different cotton area[J/OL]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(3): 247-257[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.sxhlzh.20200512.
[7]
张大伟, 魏鑫, 徐海江, 等. 不同棉花品种对脱叶剂的响应[J/OL]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1): 146-153[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.01.018.
Zhang Dawei, Wei Xin, Xu Haijiang, et al. Study on the response of cotton varieties with different genotypes to defoliants[J/OL]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1): 146-153[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.01.018.
[8]
王天友. 南疆陆地棉种质资源遗传多样性及对脱叶剂的敏感性分析[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2020.
Wang Tianyou. Analysis of genetic diversity and sensitivity to defoliant of upland cotton germplasm resources in Southern Xinjiang[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2020.
[9]
周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶剂对两种机采模式下棉花脱叶效果及纤维品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11): 144-152[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0628.
Zhou Xianlin, Tan Qin, Wang Long, et al. Influence of defoliant on defoliation effect and fiber quality of cotton under two kinds of mechanical harvesting modes[J/OL]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 144-152[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0628.
[10]
Jin D S, Wang X R, Xu Y C, et al. Chemical defoliant promotes leaf abscission by altering ROS metabolism and photosynthetic efficiency in Gossypium hirsutum[J/OL]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(8): 2738[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082738.
[11]
周婷婷, 肖庆刚, 杜睿, 等. 我国棉花脱叶催熟技术研究进展[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(2): 170-184[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.ztthxq.20200303.
Zhou Tingting, Xiao Qinggang, Du Rui, et al. Research advances on cotton harvest aids in China[J/OL]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(2): 170-184[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.ztthxq.20200303.
[12]
马立刚, 王树林, 王燕, 等. 脱叶催熟剂用量对不同棉花品种脱叶效果及产量构成与品质的影响[J/OL]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(5): 16-22[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201901013.
Ma Ligang, Wang Shulin, Wang Yan, et al. Effects of different application rates of defoliant/ripener combination on the defolia-tion effectiveness, yield, and fiber quality of cotton plants[J/OL]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 39(5): 16-22[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201901013.
[13]
张文, 冯杨, 刘铨义, 等. 脱叶剂不同施用方法对棉花脱叶吐絮及产量和品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(5): 26-28[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zwlt.20180515.
Zhang Wen, Feng Yang, Liu Quanyi, et al. Effects of different application methods of defoliants on defoliation, boll opening, yield and quality of cotton[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(5): 26-28[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zwlt.20180515.
[14]
刘婵, 马银虎, 李田甜, 等. 不同脱叶剂对棉花产量品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(11): 11-15[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.lchsl.20201112.
Liu Chan, Ma Yinhu, Li Tiantian, et al. The effect of different defoliants on cotton yield and quality[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(11): 11-15[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.lchsl.20201112.
[15]
Faircloth J C, Edmisten K L, Wells R, et al. The influence of defoliation timing on yields and quality of two cotton cultivars[J/OL]. Crop Science, 2004, 44(1): 165-172[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0165.
[16]
Karademir E, Karademir C, Basbag S. Determination the effect of defoliation timing on cotton yield and quality[J/OL]. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2007, 8(3): 357-362[2022-12-19]. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/30696.
[17]
高丽丽, 李淦, 徐新霞, 等. 4种棉花脱叶剂脱叶效果的比较研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016, 39(1): 35-39.
Gao Lili, Li Gan, Xu Xinxia, et al. Comparison of defolianting effects of the defoliants applied for 4 varieties of cotton[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016, 39(1): 35-39.
[18]
马辉, 戴路, 李静, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂综合性状效果试验研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(4): 15-17[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2013.04.006.
Ma Hui, Dai Lu, Li Jing, et al. Study on comprehensive characters of maturation and defoliation of cotton[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2013, 40(4): 15-17[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2013.04.006.
[19]
闫向辉, 刘向新. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术[J/OL]. 新疆农机化, 2004(4): 48, 61[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7782.2004.04.035.
Yan Xianghui, Liu Xiangxin. The chemical defoliation and ripening technology of cotton[J/OL]. Xinjiang Agricultural Mechanization, 2004(4): 48, 61[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7782.2004.04.035.
[20]
Bange M P, Long R L, Constable G A, et al. Minimizing immature fiber and neps in upland cotton[J/OL]. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(2): 781-789[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0454.
[21]
廖宝鹏, 王崧嫚, 杜明伟, 等. 棉花不同部位主茎叶对脱叶剂噻苯隆的响应及机理[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(5): 418-424[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.lbpdmw.20200817.
Liao Baopeng, Wang Songman, Du Mingwei, et al. Responses and underlying mechanisms of different mainstem leaves on cotton to defoliant thidiazuron[J/OL]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(5): 418-424[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1002-7807.lbpdmw.20200817.
[22]
王希, 杜明伟, 田晓莉, 等. 黄河流域棉区棉花脱叶催熟剂的筛选研究[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2015, 42(5): 15-21[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1000-632X(2015)0015-07.
Wang Xi, Du Mingwei, Tian Xiaoli, et al. Screening for suitable cotton harvest aids in the yellow river region[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2015, 42(5): 15-21[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1000-632X(2015)0015-07.
[23]
朱继杰, 王士杰, 赵红霞, 等. 适宜机采和露地直播棉花品种冀丰1458选育及配套栽培技术[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2022, 49(5): 25-30[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/cc20210241.
Zhu Jijie, Wang Shijie, Zhao Hongxia, et al. Breeding and cultivation techniques of cotton variety Jifeng 1458 suitable for machine harvesting and open field direct seeding[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2022, 49(5): 25-30[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/cc20210241.
[24]
Suttle J C. Disruption of the polar auxin transport system in co-tton seedlings following treatment with the defoliant thidiazuron[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 1988, 86(1): 241-245[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.86.1.241.
[25]
Li F, Wu Q, Liao B, et al. Thidiazuron promotes leaf abscission by regulating the crosstalk complexities between ethylene, auxin, and cytokinin in cotton[J/OL]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(5): 2696[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052696.
[26]
Xu J, Chen L, Sun H, et al. Crosstalk between cytokinin and ethylene signaling pathways regulates leaf abscission in cotton in response to chemical defoliants[J/OL]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70(5): 1525-1538[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz036.
[27]
王谊, 杨丽红. 脱叶剂对棉花脱叶率和产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(4): 28-30.
Wang Yi, Yang Lihong. Effect of cotton defoliant on the defolia-tion rate and yield in Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(4): 28-30.
[28]
高丽丽, 李淦, 康正华, 等. 脱叶剂对棉花叶片叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J/OL]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(4): 345-352[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201604005.
Gao Lili, Li Gan, Kang Zhenghua, et al. Effect of defoliants on chlorophyll fluorescence of cotton leaves[J/OL]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(4): 345-352[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201604005.
[29]
高丽丽. 脱叶剂喷施时间对棉花生理调节效应的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016.
Gao Lili. Study of defoliants spraying time on cotton physiological mechanism[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016.
[30]
田景山, 张煦怡, 张丽娜, 等. 新疆机采棉花实现叶片快速脱落需要的温度条件[J/OL]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 613-620[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84068.
Tian Jingshan, Zhang Xuyi, Zhang Lina, et al. Temperature conditions required for rapid leaf shedding by machine picking cotton in Xinjiang[J/OL]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 613-620[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84068.
[31]
Long R L, Bange M P. Consequences of immature fiber on the processing performance of upland cotton[J/OL]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 121(3): 401-407[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.008.
[32]
靳丁沙. 噻苯隆调控棉花叶片脱落的机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021.
Jin Dingsha. The mechanism of thidiazuron regulating cotton leaf abscission[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021.
[33]
张煦怡. 新疆棉区脱叶催熟剂对棉铃发育及纤维品质形成的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018.
Zhang Xuyi. Effect of defoliation on cotton boll development and fiber quality formation in Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2018.
[34]
田景山, 张煦怡, 王文敏, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂对纤维品质的影响及应用时间的确定[J/OL]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1388-1397[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94196.
Tian Jingshan, Zhang Xuyi, Wang Wenmin, et al. A method of defoliant application based on fiber damage and boll growth period of machine-harvested cotton[J/OL]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(9): 1388-1397[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94196.
[35]
Pinnamaneni S R, Anapalli S S, Sui R, et al. Effects of irrigation and planting geometry on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber quality and seed composition[J/OL]. Journal of Cotton Research, 2021, 4: 2[2022-12-15]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-020-00078-w.
[36]
张煦怡, 田景山, 随龙龙, 等. 新疆棉区脱叶催熟剂喷施时间对棉铃发育的影响[J/OL]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(6): 15-20, 35[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zxyzwf.20180614.
Zhang Xuyi, Tian Jingshan, Sui Longlong, et al. The impact of defoliation timing on cotton boll development in Xinjiang region[J/OL]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(6): 15-20, 35[2022-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.11963/1000-632X.zxyzwf.20180614.
PDF(1133 KB)

568

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/