棉花学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 54-65.doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.wsjsmz.20201104
汪苏洁(),贵会平(
),董强,张恒恒,王香茹,牛静,张西岭(
),宋美珍(
)
收稿日期:
2019-12-19
出版日期:
2021-01-15
发布日期:
2021-02-25
通讯作者:
张西岭,宋美珍
E-mail:wangsujie951230@163.com;huiping.828@163.com;hainan1571@163.com;songmzccri@163.com
作者简介:
汪苏洁(1995―),女,硕士研究生, 基金资助:
Wang Sujie(),Gui Huiping(
),Dong Qiang,Zhang Hengheng,Wang Xiangru,Niu Jing,Zhang Xiling(
),Song Meizhen(
)
Received:
2019-12-19
Online:
2021-01-15
Published:
2021-02-25
Contact:
Zhang Xiling,Song Meizhen
E-mail:wangsujie951230@163.com;huiping.828@163.com;hainan1571@163.com;songmzccri@163.com
摘要:
【目的】 研究不同有机肥替代率对黄河流域棉株生物量、养分积累、产量、氮磷比及土壤肥力的影响,试图探索出有机肥替代化肥的适宜替代率,为有机肥、无机肥在黄河流域棉田合理施用提供参考依据。【方法】 试验始于2016年,在中国农业科学院棉花研究所试验基地设置6个施肥处理:T1:不施肥,T2:100%化肥,T3:20%有机肥+80%化肥,T4:40%有机肥+60%化肥,T5:50%有机肥+50%化肥,T6:100%有机肥。经3年施肥后,2018年进行田间取样,分析不同施肥处理对棉花生物量、养分积累、产量、氮磷比及土壤肥力的影响。【结果】 (1)有机肥替代50%化肥处理提高棉株生物量、养分积累和籽棉产量。(2)与单施化肥处理相比,施用有机肥处理土壤有机质、全氮、速效磷、碱解氮含量均有增高趋势,全部施有机肥显著增加土壤速效磷含量。(3)棉株全氮、全磷积累量与棉株生物量呈极显著正相关,棉株根、茎氮磷比与籽棉产量呈极显著负相关。【结论】 有机肥替代部分化肥能减少化肥用量,连续应用有机肥替代部分化肥具有增加土壤肥力的趋势;有机肥替代50%化肥处理能增加棉花生物量、养分积累量,提高籽棉产量,替代效果最好。
汪苏洁,贵会平,董强,张恒恒,王香茹,牛静,张西岭,宋美珍. 有机肥替代对棉花养分积累、产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(1): 54-65.
Wang Sujie,Gui Huiping,Dong Qiang,Zhang Hengheng,Wang Xiangru,Niu Jing,Zhang Xiling,Song Meizhen. Effects of organic fertilizer substitution on cotton nutrient accumulation, yield and soil fertility[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 33(1): 54-65.
表2
有机肥不同替代比例对棉花生物量的影响"
时期 Stages | 处理 Treatments | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs | 整株 Whole plant |
蕾期 | T1 | 1.02 b | 0.97 d | 4.08 b | — | 6.07 c |
Squaring stage | T2 | 1.15 b | 1.35 b | 4.64 ab | — | 7.14 abc |
T3 | 1.03 b | 1.05 d | 4.10 ab | — | 6.18 c | |
T4 | 1.13 b | 1.18 c | 4.38 ab | — | 6.70 bc | |
T5 | 1.51 a | 1.59 a | 5.10 ab | — | 8.20 a | |
T6 | 1.04 b | 1.31 bc | 5.21 a | — | 7.57 ab | |
时期 Stages | 处理 Treatments | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs | 整株 Whole plant |
花期 Flowering stage | T1 | 5.18 b | 9.32 c | 13.50 c | 2.50 c | 30.50 d |
T2 | 6.53 b | 14.42 b | 19.17 b | 4.33 ab | 44.45 bc | |
T3 | 5.82 b | 12.75 b | 18.02 b | 3.00 bc | 39.58 c | |
T4 | 6.65 b | 17.50 a | 20.37 b | 5.07 a | 49.58 b | |
T5 | 8.67 a | 20.23 a | 25.67 a | 5.15 a | 59.72 a | |
T6 | 5.50 b | 12.25 bc | 18.92 b | 3.30 bc | 39.97 c | |
铃期 | T1 | 8.36 b | 30.03 b | 43.30 a | 50.90 c | 132.61 c |
Bolling | T2 | 7.73 b | 36.14 ab | 45.47 a | 70.99 bc | 160.32 bc |
stage | T3 | 8.64 b | 38.21 ab | 47.23 a | 59.29 c | 153.37 c |
T4 | 8.96 b | 41.83 ab | 51.24 a | 70.42 bc | 172.45 bc | |
T5 | 13.70 a | 45.21 a | 50.90 a | 92.43 a | 202.23 a | |
T6 | 9.94 b | 48.45 a | 54.69 a | 83.28 ab | 196.36 ab | |
吐絮期 | T1 | 15.10 a | 38.15 b | 38.55 d | 119.58 b | 211.38 b |
Boll Opening stage | T2 | 18.67 a | 58.85 a | 53.70 ab | 137.77 ab | 268.99 a |
T3 | 16.83 a | 55.07 a | 58.23 a | 125.21 b | 255.34 ab | |
T4 | 17.37 a | 56.88 a | 60.23 a | 140.56 ab | 275.03 a | |
T5 | 18.40 a | 60.75 a | 43.98 cd | 172.95 a | 296.07 a | |
T6 | 17.37 a | 55.87 a | 50.05 bc | 136.91 ab | 260.19 ab |
表3
有机肥不同替代比例对棉花氮积累的影响"
时期 Stages | 处理 Treatments | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs | 整株 Whole plant |
蕾期 Squaring stage | T1 | 11.91 a | 19.64 b | 151.44 c | — | 183.00 b |
T2 | 14.36 a | 28.07 ab | 183.71 abc | — | 226.15 ab | |
T3 | 12.34 a | 21.47 ab | 164.74 bc | — | 198.55 b | |
T4 | 14.99 a | 24.62 ab | 172.50 abc | — | 212.12 ab | |
T5 | 17.07 a | 32.29 a | 204.69 ab | — | 254.05 a | |
T6 | 12.16 a | 25.34 a | 209.71 a | — | 247.22 a | |
花期 Flowering stage | T1 | 33.02 b | 100.90 d | 482.08 c | 85.53 c | 701.54 c |
T2 | 40.76 b | 154.35 bc | 718.76 b | 133.15 ab | 1 047.02 b | |
T3 | 36.98 b | 140.40 c | 679.62 b | 103.02 bc | 960.03 b | |
T4 | 46.58 b | 181.22 ab | 712.67 b | 168.20a | 1 108.66 b | |
T5 | 62.04 a | 211.32 a | 949.05 a | 163.36 a | 1 385.77 a | |
T6 | 33.70 b | 125.52 cd | 660.45 b | 105.64 bc | 925.31 b | |
铃期 Bolling stage | T1 | 57.35 b | 227.45 b | 1 218.39 a | 1 461.50 bc | 2 964.69 b |
T2 | 49.79 b | 266.04 ab | 1 316.58 a | 1 506.67 bc | 3 139.09 b | |
T3 | 61.22 b | 334.37ab | 1 555.02 a | 1 382.60 c | 3 333.20 ab | |
T4 | 60.61 b | 348.60 ab | 1 652.30 a | 1 608.47 ab | 3 669.98 ab | |
T5 | 93.89 a | 398.56 a | 1 540.52 a | 1 963.14 a | 3 996.11 a | |
T6 | 67.81 b | 360.54 ab | 1 597.28 a | 1 790.15 ab | 3 815.78 ab | |
吐絮期 Boll Opening stage | T1 | 113.63 a | 372.01 b | 934.31 b | 2 268.29 d | 3 688.24 b |
T2 | 133.82 a | 528.63 ab | 1 520.75 a | 3 017.17 bc | 5 200.37 a | |
T3 | 129.31 a | 519.78 ab | 1 583.75 a | 2 438.59 c | 4 671.43 a | |
T4 | 128.48 a | 539.77 ab | 1 668.83 a | 2 863.30 ab | 5 200.38 a | |
T5 | 136.18 a | 584.98 a | 1 051.48 b | 3 802.20 a | 5 574.84 a | |
T6 | 126.26 a | 507.55 ab | 1 198.39 b | 2 859.01 cd | 4 691.21 a |
表4
有机肥不同替代比例对棉花磷积累的影响"
时期 Stages | 处理 Treatments | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs | 整株 Whole plant |
蕾期 Squaring stage | T1 | 2.90 b | 4.14 d | 14.63c | — | 21.67 d |
T2 | 3.50 ab | 5.75 b | 18.55 abc | — | 27.80 abc | |
T3 | 3.13 b | 4.18 d | 11.53 c | — | 22.61 cd | |
T4 | 3.56 ab | 4.83 cd | 16.31 bc | — | 24.71 bcd | |
T5 | 4.44 a | 6.66 a | 20.28 ab | — | 31.38 a | |
T6 | 3.14 b | 5.54 bc | 20.97 a | — | 29.65 ab | |
花期 Flowering stage | T1 | 5.14 c | 14.70 d | 39.83 c | 13.76 c | 73.43 c |
T2 | 6.57 bc | 21.92 bc | 61.87 b | 22.42 ab | 112.78 b | |
T3 | 6.27 bc | 18.34 cd | 60.14 b | 17.13 bc | 101.88 b | |
T4 | 7.86 b | 26.24 b | 60.99 b | 29.02 a | 124.11 b | |
T5 | 11.25 a | 32.90 a | 83.36 a | 29.07 a | 156.58 a | |
T6 | 5.22 c | 18.14 cd | 59.00 b | 18.26 bc | 100.62 b | |
铃期 Bolling stage | T1 | 9.83 b | 38.69 b | 119.83 c | 271.72 c | 440.06 c |
T2 | 8.53 b | 45.58 ab | 127.72 bc | 286.33 bc | 468.16 bc | |
T3 | 11.90 b | 60.30 ab | 161.19 ab | 261.09 c | 494.48 bc | |
T4 | 11.35 b | 61.06 ab | 170.71 a | 308.23 bc | 551.35 ab | |
T5 | 17.83 a | 69.27 a | 165.50 ab | 391.91 a | 644.51 a | |
T6 | 12.31 b | 66.65 a | 174.44 a | 345.02 ab | 598.42 a | |
吐絮期 Boll Opening stage | T1 | 22.20 a | 67.71 b | 126.45 c | 463.50 c | 679.86 c |
T2 | 25.70 a | 98.81 ab | 187.81 ab | 608.60 b | 920.93 ab | |
T3 | 26.33 a | 108.00 a | 236.32 a | 525.68 bc | 896.33 b | |
T4 | 22.66 a | 107.09 a | 243.13 a | 579.47 bc | 952.36 ab | |
T5 | 27.19 a | 118.76 a | 164.74 bc | 772.59 a | 1 083.28 a | |
T6 | 22.81 a | 109.14 a | 223.58 a | 609.14 b | 964.67 ab |
表5
有机肥不同替代比例对棉花钾积累的影响"
时期 Stages | 处理 Treatments | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs | 整株 Whole plant |
蕾期 Squaring stage | T1 | 21.12 b | 23.85 d | 77.62 b | — | 122.59 c |
T2 | 25.34 ab | 35.82 b | 104.24 ab | — | 165.41 ab | |
T3 | 22.20 b | 28.14 cd | 88.80 ab | — | 139.14 bc | |
T4 | 25.42 ab | 31.76 bc | 94.50 ab | — | 151.68 abc | |
T5 | 31.27 a | 41.79 a | 106.87 ab | — | 179.92 a | |
T6 | 21.83 b | 32.59 bc | 110.84 a | — | 165.26 ab | |
花期 Flowering stage | T1 | 63.74 b | 156.74 e | 177.76 c | 49.75 c | 447.99 d |
T2 | 79.58 b | 249.57 bc | 277.36 b | 84.86 ab | 691.36 bc | |
T3 | 69.86 b | 228.80 cd | 266.55 b | 61.68 bc | 626.89 bc | |
T4 | 85.78 b | 294.46 b | 283.35 b | 101.94 a | 765.53 b | |
T5 | 116.10 a | 361.02 a | 422.85 a | 101.43 a | 1 001.40 a | |
T6 | 65.07 b | 193.46 de | 234.40 bc | 63.86 bc | 556.79 cd | |
铃期 Bolling stage | T1 | 60.51 b | 271.66 b | 317.95 b | 1 099.67 c | 1 749.80 c |
T2 | 61.27 b | 437.22 ab | 502.50 a | 1 240.18 bc | 2 241.17 b | |
T3 | 72.92 b | 494.53 a | 564.45 a | 1 039.55 c | 2 171.44 bc | |
T4 | 71.11 b | 489.43 a | 588.80 a | 1 235.85 bc | 2 385.18 b | |
T5 | 112.57 a | 559.12 a | 565.75 a | 1 607.76 a | 2 845.20 a | |
T6 | 82.70 b | 499.23 a | 486.61 a | 1 438.10 ab | 2 506.64 ab | |
吐絮期 Boll Opening stage | T1 | 104.31 a | 300.18 b | 301.87 c | 2 476.49 b | 3 182.85 c |
T2 | 129.73 a | 596.40 a | 615.20 ab | 2 981.27 b | 4 322.60 ab | |
T3 | 120.13 a | 536.37 a | 614.60 ab | 2 627.05 b | 3 898.15 bc | |
T4 | 116.74 a | 529.99 a | 676.49 a | 2 938.45 b | 4 261.67 ab | |
T5 | 127.29 a | 552.80 a | 458.74 bc | 3 673.39 a | 4 812.22 a | |
T6 | 117.45 a | 501.14 ab | 457.22 bc | 2 746.34 b | 3 822.15 bc |
表6
有机肥不同替代比例对棉花产量及其构成因素的影响"
处理 Treatments | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield /(kg·hm-2) | 产量构成因子Yield component factors | |||||||||
铃重Boll weight /g | 衣分Lint percentage /% | ||||||||||
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||
T1 | 4 001.40 a | 3 971.71 a | 4 071.76 a | 5.51 a | 5.28 a | 5.21 a | 37.43 a | 40.98 a | 39.52 a | ||
T2 | 4 066.66 a | 4 178.83 a | 4 153.02 a | 5.37 a | 5.32 a | 5.43 a | 36.50 ab | 41.12 a | 39.90 a | ||
T3 | 3 740.17 a | 4 024.77 a | 4 299.12 a | 5.50 a | 5.25 a | 5.51 a | 36.23 b | 40.87 a | 40.50 a | ||
T4 | 3 957.14 a | 3 990.48 a | 4 289.16 a | 5.51 a | 5.02 a | 5.39 a | 36.40 b | 40.51 ab | 39.92 a | ||
T5 | 4 012.03 a | 4 108.86 a | 4 314.38 a | 5.57 a | 5.56 a | 5.37 a | 36.90 ab | 40.06 ab | 39.69 a | ||
T6 | 3 752.28 a | 4 000.61 a | 4 208.84 a | 5.58 a | 5.46 a | 5.52 a | 36.20 b | 39.82 b | 40.41 a |
表7
有机肥不同替代比例对土壤肥力的影响"
处理 Treatments | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen /(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphate /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium /(mg·kg-1) | pH |
T1 | 15.86 a | 1.03 b | 65.24 a | 14.12 ab | 230.45 a | 8.03 a |
T2 | 16.01 a | 1.06 ab | 62.80 a | 12.57 b | 239.58 a | 8.05 a |
T3 | 16.50 a | 1.10 ab | 65.12 a | 13.80 ab | 243.75 a | 7.97 a |
T4 | 16.35 a | 1.15 a | 65.16 a | 16.69 ab | 237.19 a | 7.99 a |
T5 | 16.20 a | 1.11 ab | 68.41 a | 15.40 ab | 234.98 a | 7.98 a |
T6 | 16.92 a | 1.11 ab | 70.10 a | 17.58 a | 243.54 a | 8.10 a |
表8
棉花生物量、产量和棉花养分指标的相关分析"
指标 Index | 生物量 Biomass /(g·plant-1) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield /(kg·hm-2) |
植株全氮含量 Plant total nitrogen content | 0.925** | 0.295 |
植株全磷含量 Plant total nitrogen content | 0.936** | 0.296 |
根氮磷比 Root N:P ratio | -0.118 | -0.881** |
茎氮磷比 Steam N:P ratio | -0.054 | -0.654** |
叶氮磷比 Leaf N:P ratio | -0.280 | -0.007 |
生殖器官氮磷比 Reproductive organs N:P ratio | -0.330 | -0.220 |
整株氮磷比 Whole plant N:P ratio | -0.330 | -0.076 |
[1] |
Asif I, Dong Q, Madeeha A, et al. Untangling the molecular mechanisms and functions of nitrate to improve nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculuture, 2020, 100(3):904-914. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10085.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10085 |
[2] |
奚振邦, 王寓群, 杨佩珍. 中国现代农业发展中的有机肥问题[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(12):1874-1878. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.12.014.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.12.014 |
Xi Zhenbang, Wang Yuqun, Yang Peizhen. The issue on organic manure in developing modern agriculture in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(12):1874-1878.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.12.014 |
|
[3] |
Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182570.
doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447 |
[4] |
林先贵, 冯有智. 潮土农田微生物研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(4):416-434. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.151347.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.151347 |
Lin Xiangui, Feng Youzhi. Research progresses of farmland microorganisms in fluvo-aquic soil of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(4):416-434.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.151347 |
|
[5] |
田昌玉, 左余宝, 林治安, 等. 有机肥与无机肥氮素平行施用对土壤硝态氮积累与玉米产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(6):1418-1422. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.06.025.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.06.025 |
Tian Changyu, Zuo Yubao, Lin Zhi’an, et al. Corn yield and nitrate-N accumulation in the soil as influenced by organic and inorganic fertilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(6):1418-1422.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.06.025 |
|
[6] |
吴迪, 黄绍文, 金继运. 氮肥运筹、配施有机肥和坐水种对春玉米产量与养分吸收转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2):317-326. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.011.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.011 |
Wu Di, Huang Shaowen, Jin Jiyun. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management, organic manure application and bed-irrigation sowing on maize yield, and nutrient uptake and translocation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2009, 15(2):317-326.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.011 |
|
[7] |
张绪成, 于显枫, 王红丽, 等. 半干旱区减氮增钾、有机肥替代对全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯水肥利用和生物量积累的调控[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(5):852-864. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.005.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.005 |
Zhang Xucheng, Yu Xianfeng, Wang Hongli, et al. Regulations of reduced chemical nitrogen, potassium fertilizer application and organic manure substitution on potato water fertilizer utilization and biomass assimilation under whole field plastics mulching and ridge-furrow planting system on semi-arid area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(5):852-864.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.005 |
|
[8] |
张昊青, 于昕阳, 翟丙年, 等. 渭北旱地麦田配施有机肥减量施氮的作用效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(1):124-133. DOI: 10.11654/jaes.2016-0827.
doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016-0827 |
Zhang Haoqing, Yu Xinyang, Zhai Bingnian, et al. Reducing N fertilization rate through a combination of manure and chemical fertilizer in Weibei dryland[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017, 36(1):124-133.
doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016-0827 |
|
[9] |
Parijat S, Bhattacharya S S, Baruah K K. Organic substitution in fertilizer schedule: Impacts on soil health, photosynthetic efficiency, yield and assimilation in wheat grown in alluvial soil[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 203:102-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.003 |
[10] |
Asif I, Gui Huiping, Zhang Hengheng, et al. Genotypic variation in cotton genotypes for phosphorus-use efficiency[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(11):689. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9110689.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9110689 |
[11] |
秦宇坤, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 等. 施氮量对低肥力棉田土壤氮素及棉花养分吸收利用影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(3):242-253. DOI: 10.11963/1002-7807.qykxwx.20190430.
doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.qykxwx.20190430 |
Qin Yukun, Li Pengcheng, Zheng Cangsong, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates on soil nitrogen content, nutrient uptake and utilization of cotton in low fertility fields[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(3):242-253.
doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.qykxwx.20190430 |
|
[12] |
王宁, 南宏宇, 冯克云. 化肥减量配施有机肥对棉田土壤微生物生物量、酶活性和棉花产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1):173-181. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.022.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.022 |
Wang Ning, Nan Hongyu, Feng Keyun. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer application on cotton soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1):173-181.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.022 |
|
[13] |
哈丽哈什·依巴提, 李青军, 张炎. 有机肥氮替代部分化肥氮对棉花养分吸收、氮素利用和产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019, (3):137-142. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.18267.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.18267 |
Halihashi Yibati, Li Qingjun, Zhang Yan. Effects of organic manure nitrogen replacing chemical fertilizer nitrogen on cotton nutrient uptake, nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019, (3):137-142.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.18267 |
|
[14] |
姚金波, 张永山, 陈伟, 等. 中熟常规转基因抗虫棉——中棉所100[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(9):33-34. DOI: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201609009.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201609009 |
Yao Jinbo, Zhang Yongshan, Chen Wei, et al. A transgenic insect-resistance cotton variety, CCRI 100[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(9):33-34.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201609009 |
|
[15] | 金宏鑫. 城市污泥堆肥对大豆重金属积累及养分吸收的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2012. |
Jin Hongxin. Effects of munocipal sewage sludge compost on heavy metal accumulation and nutrient uptake of soybean[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2012. | |
[16] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 16-106. |
Bao Shidan. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M].3ed. BeiJing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 16-106. | |
[17] |
戴婷婷, 盛建东, 陈波浪. 磷肥不同用量对棉花干物质及氮磷钾吸收分配的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(5):466-470. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2010.05.014.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2010.05.014 |
Dai Tingting, Sheng Jiandong, Chen Bolang. Effect of different phosphorus fertilizer rate on dry matter accumulation and the absorption and distribution of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium of cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(5):466-470.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2010.05.014 |
|
[18] |
田小明, 李俊华, 危常州, 等. 连续3年施用生物有机肥对土壤有机质组分、棉花养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(5):1111-1118. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12026.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12026 |
Tian Xiaoming, Li Junhua, Wei Changzhou, et al. Effects of continuous application of bio-organic fertilizer for three yearson soil organic matter fractions, cotton nutrient absorption and yield[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2012, 18(5):1111-1118.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12026 |
|
[19] |
罗佳, 盛建东, 王永旭, 等. 不同有机肥对盐渍化耕地土壤盐分、养分及棉花产量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(3):48-53. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2016.03.009.
doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2016.03.009 |
Luo Jia, Sheng Jiandong, Wang Yongxu, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on soil salinity, nutrients and cotton yield on salt-affecte land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(3):48-53.
doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2016.03.009 |
|
[20] |
孟琳, 张小莉, 蒋小芳, 等. 有机肥料氮替代部分化肥氮对稻谷产量的影响及替代率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(2):532-542. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.019.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.019 |
Meng Lin, Zhang Xiaoli, Jiang Xiaofang, et al. Effects of partial mineral nitrogen substitution by organic fertilizer nitrogen on the yields of rice grains and their proper substitution rate[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(2):532-542.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.019 |
|
[21] |
谢军, 赵亚南, 陈轩敬, 等. 有机肥氮替代化肥氮提高玉米产量和氮素吸收利用效率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(20):3934-3943. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.008.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.008 |
Xie Jun, Zhao Yanan, Chen Xuanjing, et al. Nitrogen of organic manure replacing chemical nitrogenous fertilizer improvemaize yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20):3934-3943.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.008 |
|
[22] |
温延臣, 张曰东, 袁亮, 等. 商品有机肥替代化肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(11):2136-2142. DOI: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029 |
Wen Yanchen, Zhang Yuedong, Yuan Liang, et al. Crop yield and soil fertility response to commercial organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(11):2136-2142.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029 |
|
[23] |
汤春纯, 李海平, 夏照明. 配施有机肥对提高棉花产量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2007, 37(6):123-124. DOI: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029 |
Tang Chunchun, Li Haiping, Xia Zhaoming. Effect of organic fertilizer on cotton yield and fertilizer utilization[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 37(6):123-124.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2007.06.029 |
|
[24] |
邢亚薇, 李春越, 刘津, 等. 长期施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤微生物丰度的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1351-1358.d DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.003.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.003 |
Xing Yawei, Li Chunyue, Liu Jin, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil microbial abundance in farmland of the loess plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(4):1351-1358.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.003 |
|
[25] |
裴洲洋, 陈油鸿, 江春, 等. 不同施肥结构对土壤理化性质及烤烟氮、磷、钾含量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(21):35-37, 45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2016.21.014.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2016.21.014 |
Pei Zhouyang, Chen Youhong, Jiang Chun, et al. Effects of different fertilization structures on soil physical and chemical properties and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of flue-cured[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 22(21):35-37, 45.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2016.21.014 |
|
[26] |
杨旸, 张树兰, 杨学云, 等. 长期定位施肥对旱作塿土小麦产量、养分效率及养分平衡的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(5):1162-1168. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2017.05.20.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2017.05.20 |
Yang Yang, Zhang Shulan, Yang Xueyun, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on wheat yield, nutrient use efficiency and nutrient balance in rainfed lou soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017, 48(5):1162-1168.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2017.05.20 |
|
[27] |
杨峰, 黄山, 崔亮, 等. 玉米/大豆套作下作物叶片氮、磷动态特征及其相关性分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4):781-789. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0402.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0402 |
Yang Feng, Huang Shan, Cui Liang, et al. Dynamic changes and correlations of P and N concentrations in crop leaves under relay intercropping system of maize and soybean[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(4):781-789.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0402 |
|
[28] |
杨有德, 李月芬, 赵兰坡, 等. 不同装土量对玉米植株·根系·籽粒养分浓度及化学计量比的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(22):10456-10460, 10475. DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2009.22.092.
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2009.22.092 |
Yang Youde, Li Yuefen, Zhao Lanpo, et al. Effects of different soil amounts on nutrients concentration and stoichiometry of maize plant, root and seed[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(22):10456-10460, 10475.
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2009.22.092 |
|
[29] |
南学军, 蔡立群, 武均, 等. 生物质炭与氮肥配施对春小麦产量及其C︰N︰P的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(8):1154-1162. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161184.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161184 |
Nan Xuejun, Cai Liqun, Wu Ju, et al. Effect of combined application of biochar and N-fertilizer on yield and C∶N∶P ratio of spring wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(8):1154-1162.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161184 |
|
[30] | 陈智伟. 生物质炭和磷肥施用对土壤养分、小白菜生物量和植株养分含量的影响[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2018. |
Chen Zhiwei. Effect of biochar and ohosphate fertilizer application on soil nutrient, biomass and plant nutrient contents of pakchoi[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Normal University, 2018. |
[1] | 李鸣凤,彭文勇,何华,刘新伟,赵竹青. 外施不同形态硼对棉花吸收利用硼及其他矿质元素的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(5): 385-392. |
[2] | 段佳宏,李楠楠,王军,李军宏,郝先哲,罗宏海,杨国正. 滴灌带埋设深度对无膜棉产量形成的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(5): 404-411. |
[3] | 王燕,张谦,王树林,韩硕,冯国艺,董明,钱玉源,祁虹. 耕层重构对棉田土壤养分、微生物数量与酶活性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(5): 422-434. |
[4] | 杨长琴,张国伟,王晓婧,刘瑞显,倪万潮. 不同种植模式棉花产量、种植效益与氮素利用率比较分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(4): 307-318. |
[5] | 张岚,程琦,梁士辰,邓雨潇,潘玉欣. 棉花UGPase基因鉴定与生物信息学分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(4): 337-346. |
[6] | 马怡茹,吕新,祁亚琴,张泽,易翔,陈翔宇,鄢天荥,侯彤瑜. 基于无人机数码图像的机采棉脱叶率监测模型构建[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(4): 347-359. |
[7] | 苟浩琦,马常凯,张迁,范术丽,马启峰,张朝军. 棉花光敏雄性不育系psm5的培育及其育性转变规律[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(4): 360-367. |
[8] | 王林, 张强, 马江锋, 朱玉永, 田英, 李红, 毕显杰, 宋敏, 王海标, 雷天翔, 李召虎, 田晓莉, 杜明伟, 张立祯, 赵冰梅. 新疆棉区植保无人机喷施棉花脱叶催熟剂效果研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 200-208. |
[9] | 王金刚, 姜艳, 田甜, 朱永琪, 杨振康, 周天航, 张文旭, 佟炫梦, 孙嘉祺, 王海江. 减氮配施生物刺激素对棉花产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 209-223. |
[10] | 易翔, 张立福, 吕新, 张泽, 田敏, 印彩霞, 马怡茹, 范向龙. 基于无人机高光谱融合连续投影算法估算棉花地上部生物量[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 224-234. |
[11] | 孙璘, 海艳, 唐晓雪, 祖丽皮亚·艾买, 焦瑞莲, 任毓忠, 李国英. 新疆棉花茎腐病的病原鉴定及其生物学特性研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 235-246. |
[12] | 党文芳, 刘萍, 管力慧, 杨红梅, 牛新湘, 李萍, 楚敏, 娄恺, 史应武. 土壤环境因子对棉花根际与内生拮抗细菌存活数量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 247-257. |
[13] | 杨可心, 陈秀叶, 刘畅, 鹿秀云, 郭庆港, 马平. 棉花枯萎病菌新生理型菌株毒素鉴定及其活性测定[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3): 258-268. |
[14] | 安杰,韩迎春,张正贵,冯璐,雷亚平,杨北方,王国平,李小飞,王占彪,邢芳芳,熊世武,辛明华,李亚兵. 不同熟性棉花品种冠层温度分布特点[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(2): 134-143. |
[15] | 孟浩峰,雷长英,张旺锋,张亚黎. 系统调控下棉花比叶重的变化机制[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(2): 144-154. |
|